<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for The skinny on Windows Mobile 2003 Second Edition</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2004/08/12/the-skinny-on-windows-mobile-2003-second-edition/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for The skinny on Windows Mobile 2003 Second Edition</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The skinny on Windows Mobile 2003 Second Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2004/08/12/the-skinny-on-windows-mobile-2003-second-edition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2004/08/12/the-skinny-on-windows-mobile-2003-second-edition/</guid><description><![CDATA[The grumbling over HP not offering upgrades stems from the iPaq 5550/5555 being just barely one year old, and HP holding back on upgrades. The newer iPaqs are very minimal upgrades over the existing units, and so HP seems to be attempting to create artificial value in these new models being the only ones with Windows Mobile 2003SE.<br><br>Be sure to let HP and Dell know how you feel about this. In the case of HP, there is a petition you can sign. It's a small bit you can do, but hopefully the numbers will become large enough to get HP's notice, or some of the tech journalists' notice if HP fails on this.<br><br>http://www.petitiononline.com/HPWMK3SE/petition.html<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[McGroarty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The skinny on Windows Mobile 2003 Second Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2004/08/12/the-skinny-on-windows-mobile-2003-second-edition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2004/08/12/the-skinny-on-windows-mobile-2003-second-edition/</guid><description><![CDATA[HP lost my business by not releasing the 2003 OS for their original iPaq. I'm certainly not surprised in the LEAST that they're screwing their more recent customers too. <br><br>In all fairness, I did receive two upgrades - one to PPC 2000, and another to PPC 2002. Then someone at HP made a "business decision" (They decided they wanted more money, basically) and stopped permitting the upgrades. <br><br>So screw them. Someday when so-called "Pocket PCs" are more like PCs and less like throwaway appliances, maybe I'll buy another one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The skinny on Windows Mobile 2003 Second Edition]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2004/08/12/the-skinny-on-windows-mobile-2003-second-edition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2004/08/12/the-skinny-on-windows-mobile-2003-second-edition/</guid><description><![CDATA[I stopped buying HP products after getting fingers  burnt by purchasing iPAQ 5550, lousy unreliable software, unreliable battery performance. Then it seems no 2003 second edition without purchasing new device. They have to be joking. I should have learned my lesson earlier after the failure of two of HP's bubble jet printers and very shabby performance from one of their scanners.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Forster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:03AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
