<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Testing DoCoMo's microscopic premini phone</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2004/08/16/testing-docomos-microscopic-premini-phone/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Testing DoCoMo's microscopic premini phone</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Testing DoCoMo's microscopic premini phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2004/08/16/testing-docomos-microscopic-premini-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2004/08/16/testing-docomos-microscopic-premini-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have owned a Sony Ericsson T68i, T226 & now am enjoying a T637 all of which are only slightly larger than the premini & I only have one thing to say to you NTT Docomo Japan loving technophiles out there....."Get over it". American phones aren't so behind.  Besides we're about to get the Moto Mpx220....way cool!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Grendel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Testing DoCoMo's microscopic premini phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2004/08/16/testing-docomos-microscopic-premini-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2004/08/16/testing-docomos-microscopic-premini-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah:<br>doco premini 40mm 90mm 19.8mm 63g<br>siemens s55 42mm 101mm 18mm 85g<br><br>Given the curves on the (more than a year old) S55, it probably doesn't *look* larger either, though the premini has probably managed a better keyboard.  (And the S55 is only a little smaller than the Nokia 8890 from 3 years back.)  I don't really see this as a leap in size, more of a "refinement", the premini probably fits just fine in the same belt holster.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Eichin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Testing DoCoMo's microscopic premini phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2004/08/16/testing-docomos-microscopic-premini-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2004/08/16/testing-docomos-microscopic-premini-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[there is at least one smaller phone out there -- see the panasonic eb-gd55, which is four grams lighter (the premini is 69 g) and smaller in two dimensions:<br>http://www.phonecycle.com/phones/ModelDetails.asp?ModelID=1&BrandID=2<br><br>the premini *is* possibly the world's smallest *Internet-enabled* cellphone, as Engadget says here: http://www.engadget.com/entry/5563571824745669/<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[squaredancer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:23AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
