<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for The Bluetooth phone glove--no, the other phone glove</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/02/17/the-bluetooth-phone-glove-no-the-other-phone-glove/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for The Bluetooth phone glove--no, the other phone glove</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Bluetooth phone glove--no, the other phone glove]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/02/17/the-bluetooth-phone-glove-no-the-other-phone-glove/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/02/17/the-bluetooth-phone-glove-no-the-other-phone-glove/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wheres my bluetooth phone in a shoe? Inspector Gadget is good and all but Maxwell Smarts (from Get Smart) shoe phone is better!<br><br>Operator: "What number are you calling?" <br>Smart: "I'm calling Control, Operator…" <br>Operator: "You have dialed incorrectly. Give me your name and address and your dime will be refunded." <br>Smart: "Operator, I'm calling from my shoe!" <br>Operator: "What is the number of your shoe?" <br>Smart: "It's an unlisted shoe, Operator!" <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Bluetooth phone glove--no, the other phone glove]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/02/17/the-bluetooth-phone-glove-no-the-other-phone-glove/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/02/17/the-bluetooth-phone-glove-no-the-other-phone-glove/</guid><description><![CDATA[It certainly is unimaginable that two people could independently make the same correlation to a popular television show featuring a telephone built into a piece of apparel.  What are the odds?  2:1?  Even higher?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The Bluetooth phone glove--no, the other phone glove]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/02/17/the-bluetooth-phone-glove-no-the-other-phone-glove/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/02/17/the-bluetooth-phone-glove-no-the-other-phone-glove/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey guys - thanks for the 'big up'. The illustrious Engadget :) I'm honoured. I've received several emails from visitors to my site informing me that you ref'ed my 'Phone Glove'. I really appreciate you covering it. If you want any more info - photos etc - just ask.<br><br>All the best<br><br>Jason Bradbury<br>www.jasonbradbury.com]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:04AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
