http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/ Engadget Comments for Samsung's 82-inch LCD TV http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/Dec 19th 2005 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/Dec 19th 2005 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/Dec 19th 2005 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/
4 x 7.5 cucumber slices
]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/Dec 19th 2005 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/
#4's answer is funnier than mine will be, but considering their 46" LCD model is 1920x1080 and 1080p-capable, it would kind of shock me if the 82" flagship is any lower-spec'd than that.
]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/
Resolution 1,920 x RGB x 1,080 (Full HD)
Pixels 6.22 million (number of RGB sub-pixels)
Contrast Ratio 1,200:1

It is actually cut from a larger 97" panel which will probably be shown when someone tops this model.

http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/tech/200503/kt2005030718354311780.htm]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/Dec 19th 2005 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/Dec 19th 2005 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/Dec 19th 2005 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/
Yeah, because native 1080p on a big-ass screen with a 1200:1 contrast ratio just looks sooooooo bad.
]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/Dec 19th 2005 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/
Obviously you've never seen a 40+ inch LCD panel. They look terrible (blocky, poor refreshes, etc). I'm not making this up... go check one out sometime for yourself.]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/Dec 19th 2005 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/Dec 19th 2005 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/Dec 19th 2005 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/Dec 19th 2005 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/07/samsungs-82-inch-lcd-tv/Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM