<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmm. Is the camera on this, D750, and K750, CCD or CMOS? If it's CMOS, why would SE take a step back from the CCD found on S700/710a?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can you say jhymn? This will be the first itunes phone. Sort of. And by "first", I mean that I'll buy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tacotaco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Uhhh, since when is CMOS a step back? Don't Canon DSLRs use CMOS? And their shitticams use CCD?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Suntiger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh, and additionally: Can someone please release a musicphone, preferably PalmOS based, that *DOES NOT* have a camera in it? So that owners of expensive DSLRs don't have to waste money on a camera we'll never use, ever?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Suntiger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is that AAC as in,, all my music that I've ripped in iTunes?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[4 - yeah, damn right. If someone brings out a phone with these very demanding, highly-advanced specs:<br><br>Slot for 512mb+ flash memory, any type<br>Support for MP3<br>NO FREAKIN' WEAK-ASS NO-USE CAMERA OF ANY GODDAMN RESOLUTION <br>Voice calls and text messages<br><br>Then I'll walk over hot coals to buy it. Honestly, I hate cameraphones with a passion. I wouldn't mind their existence, if you could actually buy an attractively designed, well-specced phone that doesn't have a camera on it. Any suggestions?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[4 - yeah, damn right. If someone brings out a phone with these very demanding, highly-advanced specs:<br><br>Slot for 512mb+ flash memory, any type<br>Support for MP3<br>NO FREAKIN' WEAK-ASS NO-USE CAMERA OF ANY GODDAMN RESOLUTION <br>Voice calls and text messages<br><br>Then I'll walk over hot coals to buy it. Honestly, I hate cameraphones with a passion. I wouldn't mind their existence, if you could actually buy an attractively designed, well-specced phone that doesn't have a camera on it. Any suggestions?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[I had to google CCD vs CMOS since I had always assumed that Charge Coupled Devices were constructed using Complimentary Metal Oxide Silicon and not Transistor to Transistor Logic (TTL)<br><br>CCD's are an application, while CMOS and TTL are methodologies for construction. There is some serious misuse of acronyms going on in the imaging industry.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sauceruney]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[#6, it's called a camera-less Treo 600.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared Goodwin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Was the headphone jack standard size?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[At least Sony Ericsson had the iniative to produce an "itunes" phone with a generous 512mb duo. While my poor Nokia 6230 came with a 128mb MMC.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[engadget: Instead of <br>"Continue READING", kindly put "Continue SEEING", as there is nothing more to read, rather, just more pics]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[But does it have crappy reception? All the SE phones seem to suck for reception. Sony cares a lot about the extras and doesn't so much seem to care about the phone. Is this one any better?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[one question: HOW MUCH?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[$399.99 when it is released 3Q in US and it will be sold by SE directly with sim unlocked to work w/ Cingular or T-mobile.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[firerock]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[$399.99 when it is released 3Q in US and it will be sold by SE directly with sim unlocked to work w/ Cingular or T-mobile.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[firerock]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sauceruny. <br><br>People love to use acronyms on website forums and the like to make themselves feel like they are ahead of everyone else. What they really get off on is when you ask them what their acronyms actually stand for.<br><br>Mike, Can you please tell me what CCD and CMOS actually stand for.<br><br>Cheers<br><br>Pete]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pete, I'm just wondering what made you conclude that the reason Mike used the acronyms in his post is to make himself feel like he's ahead of everyone else. By the way, TTL when talking about cameras means through-the-lens. You can thank Mike for prompting you to google CMOS and CCD. Now you know what they mean.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferdinand Santos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[I didn't need to google any acronyms ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sauceruney]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just for info: CCD is charge coupled device, which is the imaging chip. There are rival images made using a CMOS process (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) which are proported to have higher dynamic range among other benefits. Hope this helps. TTL is a red herring... ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Taylor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson @ CTIA - Hands on with the W800 Walkman phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/14/sony-ericsson-ctia-hands-on-with-the-w800-walkman-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is the sound quality of the w800 the same as the k650? Do they have megabass like the z800?<br>I do not understand why in Japan and Korea there are already phones with more than 4mpixel selling, and in europe talking about a 2mp cam-phone is as if it would be the latest thing. A phone with less than 5mpix might as well have no cam at all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[amy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:11AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
