http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/ Engadget Comments for Adidas 1 review http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/
their web site is horrible!]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/They say you can get about 500 miles out of a good pair of running shoes. Do they seem like they are up to par with other shoes? Also... do they self correct (increase stability, provide motion control) for people that overpronate?]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/
Maybe they can embed a flash drive, so it'd be the coolest and most functional USB flash drive on the market.]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/
I still like asics(sp?)

dave]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/
Can you possibly, I don't know, like, write normal and stuff? I'm going to jump to conclusion and assume you don't have multiple personalities so stop reffering to yourself as "we". It gets extremely annoying when in 3 sentences there are 5 "we"s.

Cheers.
Alex]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/
these are called adidas 1.0, so we'll have to wait until version 1.5 or 2.0 for USB or bluetooth.

overall, they're fun and flashy, most comfortable shoes i've had in recent memory. they're worth it for geek factor alone.]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/
Does anyone know what sizes they're available in? I'd like a pair but have pretty big feet...]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/
I don't know if the target market is truly the avid runner, but rather the young urbanites (myself included) who want the newest thing. You don't get'em dirty because you can only clean them by using a damp towel (no washer action); I'm not going to be wearing these for anything but show. No worse than spending money on some nice dress shoes.]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/
BTW - Your boorish use of the too tired salutation "cheers" tends to undermine any comment you might have about one's word choice.]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://mobilegames.blogs.com/mobile_games_blog/2005/03/overloaded_and_.html

The free game can be download via WAP. Point you phone at wap.adidas1game.com

Have fun!
]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/
The editorial We is a known tool, but anyone who reads engadget once a week at the very least will confirm that they abuse it to no end.

I'd also add that "we" is more than annoying when it appears 20 times-count them-in an *editorial* or review about an item only one person (presumably) can use at a time.

Pe?ce]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/
BTW, I LIKED the review. A little different, but humerous. ...just like the sneakers.

BtG]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/
And as to the looks not being relevant... Since when does someone buy a pair of shoes without regarding the looks? Who wants to wear a pair of butt ugly shoes?]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/22/adidas-1-review/
If so, I'll stick with my Nike Shox...

Bill]]>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AM