<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Motorola's E680i and E685 musicphones</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/24/motorolas-e680i-and-e685-musicphones/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Motorola's E680i and E685 musicphones</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola's E680i and E685 musicphones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/24/motorolas-e680i-and-e685-musicphones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/24/motorolas-e680i-and-e685-musicphones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now if nextel would just come out with one of these.  Frustrating, all the other cell phone providers have all these cool phones and Nextel comes out with crap.  Still waiting for the i930...and waiting...and waiting... i'd switch to a different provider  but work pays my cell phone bill so I'm kinda stuck.<br><br>-jeff<br>http://blog.zemote.com<br>The iPodder Documentation Project]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff O'Hara]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola's E680i and E685 musicphones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/24/motorolas-e680i-and-e685-musicphones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/24/motorolas-e680i-and-e685-musicphones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sorry, but just because they watermarked a press image doesn't mean they "own" it. That's Motorola's press image, and we can do what we please with it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Rojas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola's E680i and E685 musicphones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/24/motorolas-e680i-and-e685-musicphones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/24/motorolas-e680i-and-e685-musicphones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sorry, but we don't need to get permission from Motorola to use a press image. That's why they're press images. If Mobile-files wishes to contact me and show me proof that they have exclusive worldwide rights to a press image, we'll remove the image. Otherwise, we're going to use what is clearly circulated press image any way we please. If they had taken the photo themselves it'd be a different story, but they didn't. Just because you watermark something doesn't mean that you own it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Rojas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola's E680i and E685 musicphones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/24/motorolas-e680i-and-e685-musicphones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/24/motorolas-e680i-and-e685-musicphones/</guid><description><![CDATA[I replaced the image, but in no way did we cross a line here. If anyone crossed a line it was Mobile-file for watermarking a photo they didn't own. If you notice, we don't watermark ANY photos, not even original photos we take at events or for reviews.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Rojas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola's E680i and E685 musicphones]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/24/motorolas-e680i-and-e685-musicphones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/24/motorolas-e680i-and-e685-musicphones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thanks, don't worry, we're very careful to keep things on the up and up. Generally speaking you can't get into too much legal trouble for simply reposting a photo--it's only if you are contacted by the copyright owner and continue to refuse to remove it that you risk serious legal liability (unless there is some other extenuating circumstance involved, like posting nude photos or whatever). We have a ton of experience using press images, and as I said, it's Mobile-files that should be worried, not us.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Rojas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
