<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for NYT reviews camera-binocular combos</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/25/nyt-reviews-camera-binocular-combos/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for NYT reviews camera-binocular combos</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NYT reviews camera-binocular combos]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/25/nyt-reviews-camera-binocular-combos/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/25/nyt-reviews-camera-binocular-combos/</guid><description><![CDATA[Those binoculars are sweet. I did a hands-on demo with them at the Outdoor Retailer show in Salt Lake. Although a stupid point - the salesman made a point that using the optics of the binocular with the 2 megapixel camera to take a shot of a detail far off in the horizon was better than taking a 5 megapixel shot with a consumer cam and zooming in. (Duh)<br><br>The instant replay feature that they are trying to sell it on (and naming it after) it is stupid in practice. <br><br>I'm a gadget enthusiast who has used a half-dozen different cameras in my day and their rep had to explain to me how the stupid thing worked. (It's confusing)...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan gardner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NYT reviews camera-binocular combos]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/25/nyt-reviews-camera-binocular-combos/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/25/nyt-reviews-camera-binocular-combos/</guid><description><![CDATA[stalkers of the world rejoice!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wolssiloa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NYT reviews camera-binocular combos]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/25/nyt-reviews-camera-binocular-combos/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/25/nyt-reviews-camera-binocular-combos/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wonder how decent is the batt life of such gadgets?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Heyuan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NYT reviews camera-binocular combos]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/25/nyt-reviews-camera-binocular-combos/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/25/nyt-reviews-camera-binocular-combos/</guid><description><![CDATA[Here is why most of these suck: the digital camera dosnt use the binoculars lenses as their opitcal system, which is pretty much stupid and a waste of space. Its just like having taped a cheap digital camera to your binocular. Junk.<br><br>Geeks.com had these for $129 last month. a 1.3MP for under $80.<br><br>Cute idea, with a crapply implementation of technology.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheZodiac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
