<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Pew backtracks on podcasting survey numbers</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/05/pew-backtracks-on-podcasting-survey-numbers/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Pew backtracks on podcasting survey numbers</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pew backtracks on podcasting survey numbers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/05/pew-backtracks-on-podcasting-survey-numbers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/05/pew-backtracks-on-podcasting-survey-numbers/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, I figured the numbers were flawed. Looks like PEW released the results too early; maybe the PE in PEW stands for "Premature Ejaculation."<br><br>Fishes,<br>narco.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[narco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pew backtracks on podcasting survey numbers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/05/pew-backtracks-on-podcasting-survey-numbers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/05/pew-backtracks-on-podcasting-survey-numbers/</guid><description><![CDATA[More like "Premature Extrapolation"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pew backtracks on podcasting survey numbers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/05/pew-backtracks-on-podcasting-survey-numbers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/05/pew-backtracks-on-podcasting-survey-numbers/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seriously, this report was quoted all over the place.  People really WANT podcasting to be a huge phenomenom and it really isn't.  At least not yet.  But really, most of the podcasts are just people talking. Meh.  Big deal.  Some of 'em are funny- some interesting or informative, but so what?  OOOh 'everyone can have their own radio show'.  But if you've got nothing to say who cares really.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[greenlightguy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pew backtracks on podcasting survey numbers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/05/pew-backtracks-on-podcasting-survey-numbers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/05/pew-backtracks-on-podcasting-survey-numbers/</guid><description><![CDATA[Has anybody done a survey of how many people have listened to people talk about listening to podcasts?  Surely, there's no easy way to inflate *that* number!<br><br>Seriously, presumably one of the reasons for doing a podcast is that you'll inspire the listener to turn into an evangelist ("Hey, I was listening to this cool podcast and...")  Getting a handle on the "podcast fanout" would be useful.<br><br>-- Jack Krupansky]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Krupansky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pew backtracks on podcasting survey numbers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/05/pew-backtracks-on-podcasting-survey-numbers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/05/pew-backtracks-on-podcasting-survey-numbers/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anyone else read this like "Pew, Internet!", as in "The internet stinks" ??  O_o]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SideSwipe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pew backtracks on podcasting survey numbers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/05/pew-backtracks-on-podcasting-survey-numbers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/05/pew-backtracks-on-podcasting-survey-numbers/</guid><description><![CDATA[To be even in the ball park as far as accuracy goes, you need at least 1600 interviewees.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Producer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pew backtracks on podcasting survey numbers]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/05/pew-backtracks-on-podcasting-survey-numbers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/05/pew-backtracks-on-podcasting-survey-numbers/</guid><description><![CDATA[file that one under.... "duh?!"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:12AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
