<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is the charger 110v or 220v?  Theoretically this should work in a Hotel with a wired connection provided you bring your own wireless AP and get past the webpage proxy with your laptop right (i.e. paying the fee, accepting their T&C, etc.)?  Vonage/Linksys annoys me by shipping their routers with only 110v. I travel overseas often and it's a PITA.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was an early vonage user, and gto really frustrated with call quality and customer service...the echo, delay and distortion finally had be give up and go back to land line. shame too; features and price are great.<br>has the qualtiy and service improved generally?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm wondering how does this phone fare against ZyXEL's P2000W Wi-Fi phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[J S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[This could be a device ahead of its time.  If muni Wi-Fi/WiMAX ever takes off on a truly national (or international) level, phones like this might become fairly popular.  They won't help you on the backroads, of course, which will keep the major wireless carriers in business, but people who rarely ever leave a Wi-Fi-enabled city might find Vonage's unlimited calling for $25/mo. a lot more appealing for mobile phone use than Verizon, Cingular or Sprint.<br><br>Of course, the phones will have to get a little more stylish first, but there you go...<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Permanent4]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[jon,<br><br>I've been with Vonage for a long time myself, and yes, the service and quality of calls has done nothing but increase as the years go by.<br><br>Right now, I have zero complaints with their service.  No echoes, no dropped calls, great web interface and support.<br><br>I'd give them a try again.  They sell new routers now instead of the cisco one i have (how geeky was that?) that look more like appliances for the home.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[We've had vonage for almost a year & love it. A cell phone is worse than vonage yet we shell out quite a bit a month for that luxury.<br>We bought it for the $27 a month unlimited everything. Save a ton off qwest local service plus add on's and at&t unlimited long distance.<br>I run a cable modem to a wireless router. The vonage is plugged in the router along with a pc & a wireless laptop & tivo box also share the bandwidth. Works perfect! Saves me $40+ a month. We just moved & I didn't have to have qwest come out & change anything or hook up anything, just unplugged qwest from the house & plugged vonage into the wall. Instant phone through out the home, same phone number. No install charges.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[realy cool concept, cant wait till it gets all the kinks out and out of beta!, and its price tag aint all that high, so this is awesome, but some bluetooth implementation would be awesome]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike G]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[What I really need is one that's not locked to a service so that I can use several of them at home with my local asterisk PBX.<br><br>I'm sure any small business would be interested in the same thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ssavitzky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[HOW MUCH!!!!!!!<br><br>damn missing link .. <br><br>Ssavitzky there are many vendors that make wifi phones that are not vendor locked. Cisco has a nice one. this page has a link to ALL of them<br><br>http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-VOIP+Phones<br><br>-b]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Benny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Benny -- thanks.  I already knew about that page, though; most of the existing WiFi phones are far too expensive (not to mention bulky and ugly).  <br><br>When they get down to $100 I'll consider buying one; more than that and I'm better off wired.  When they get down to $50 I'll think about replacing most of the phones in my house.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ssavitzky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[This old article indicates it would hit the 100 mark, http://www.dailywireless.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=3478<br><br>A bake-off of recently available WiFi handsets seems to be in order...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[M]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[The new UTStarcom F1000 is a step in the right direction for wifi phones.  The technology is continually maturing and the F1000 does have some improvements over the original ZyXEL wifon, i.e. talktime and SSID character length acceptance.  Thanks to the folks at Engadget for taking time to test and review this phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mirian Cain]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think this is a great concept for college kids. I know for me, I'll be using it to save my on cell minutes. I have WiFi in my dorm, WiFi on most of campus and in every building, WiFi when I go home. Although I wonder how it will work with your existing Vonage plan, it says "additional" phone, does this mean in addition to your Adapter, without a monthly cost? I'll use my parents plan! Hey, they're not using it during the day, and are rarely on the phone at night!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a question, and then a comment.<br><br>Can this thing dial any full sip address, such as john@doe.com, or just the crippled version where it dials a numeric "user name" and assumes that the domain is the proxy server it's connected to?  This is a huge issue with SIP telephony that product specs never seem to point out.  SIP phones that allow you to dial any SIP address can allow users to effectively grandfather out PSTN phones.<br><br>The comment is that WiMax will go beyond just being "handy"; it will take over the mobile phone network concept.  When everyone has high-speed broadband internet devices with unlimited data plans for like 50-60$/mo. and they can use those devices for unlimited "free" telephony, wimax agents are going to have reason to make towers just as prolific as mobile phone towers.  Eventually, all "cell phones" will just be standards compliant SIP Wimax devices.  That's my prediction.  Give it 5-7 more years.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WINSTON SMITH]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ahh..I figured it all out.  It doesn't need to be able to dial SIP address necessarily.  It just needs ENUM support with e164.arpa, and possibly e154.org and such.  ENUM is the future.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CLAY SHENTRUP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[When they get cheap enough, who cares about network lock? Replace the cordless phone in your house with a phone you can use at home or in any hotspot. If you work at home, and in the city, but not in between (in transit), this gizmo could save you a lot of money. Hurry up and develop it, geeks!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zane]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Review of the UTStarcom F1000, Vonage's first WiFi phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/15/review-of-the-utstarcom-f1000-vonages-first-wifi-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm still going to wait for a wifi voip phone that can run scripts to punch through public access points that require either authentication or acceptance of terms and conditions.  I'm really surprised no existing manufacturer has addressed this issue either by building in a small browser or by allowing the phone to run scripts.  Maybe the WIP-2, which is supposed to run Linux, will allow this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Gahtan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:13AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
