<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice timing with the Intel-Apple pairing? <br><br>0.5" Thick 12" Widescreen iBook with 10 hour battery life? Yes please!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Conrad Quilty-Harper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple's Intel move has been planned for a long time (over 5 years) They just kept the secret very well. <br><br>I think they already have their mind on what CPU they're going to use for their new Intel products already.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Cheung]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Snarfy]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[strider_mt2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[the super small sony one already claims 10h battery life, right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nic Seow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah they claim it ......they allways do!<br><br>But in reality all battery life goes dead when you need it the most right....ipod, nokia etc. etc.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chino Hollanda]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[laptop with oled display would be nice ... cheap and using less energy]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aircraft Captain]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[HAHHAHAHA!<br><br>To hit the magic 8-hour mark, manufacturers are looking at a number of different options, such as taping two laptops together and removing all drives:)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[locknroll]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oled display hopefully<br>Yonah processor <br>4-10 gig (at least) flash memory <br>Still lithium ion (but polymers) batteries i bet<br><br>wonder what else people ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[traquemort]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[sony vaio, the first ever notebook to reach eight hours*<br><br>*using included AC power adaptor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andalooo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[My Sony T2XP runs 6,5 to 7 hrs on a single charge, 5 hrs if you play DVDs or streaming video.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Axel Wolf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, this doesn't seem too far out... both Sony and IBM/Lenovo (and probably others) already make laptops with 7.5 hour battery life.  Even my non-Centrino, hot-ass P4-M laptop can get 4 hours with its 12 cell battery (I have the 8 cell so I only get 3), and it's 2 years old.<br><br>This is the real reason Apple ditched the PowerPC - there is no question that Intel's got everybody beat in laptop chips (not just in power consumption but in performance too), and they're only getting better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel is setting deadlines?  What are they going to do, quit selling chips to manufacturers who don't make it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[biggest single change that needs to happen is for a screen that dont need a backlight and that only use power when updating whats on the screen.<br><br>anything else is allready been pushed into the very minimum zone unless someone can come up with a cheap, reliable, solid state storage media (face it, flash is neither if one is to use it as a hardrive replacement).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hobgoblin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple didn't ditch powerpc because of the laptop battery time....my g4 ibook with 12" screen gets 6 hours of battery time on a full charge....they changed over because they couldn't cram a g5 into a powerbook]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry K]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[You can get just over eight hours out of an IBM T40 (likely the same with a T41 or T42) with the bigger main battery and the drive bay battery...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[OLEDs! OLEDs! OLEDs! OLEDs!<br><br>Hurry up, damnit!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyMac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel pushing for eight-hour laptops, sooner rather than later]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/07/intel-pushing-for-eight-hour-laptops-sooner-rather-than-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's great news but personally, I'm not holding my breath. My solution was to go out an get a batterygeek external laptop battery which is currently giving my laptop an additional 7+ hours of run time per charge. By the way, when are they going to come out with that new age high tech fuel cell battery that will provide a full week of run time per charge?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:14AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
