<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[Currently the consensus on Slashdot is that this is a hoax.  No one has been able to find the .iso or .torrent on P2P or IRC.  What have you all found?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[XiozTzu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[where is it? lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[HOAX!+]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jules Holleboom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have an exra computer right now, if I hadn't just formatted and installed Windows XP on it a week ago I would try this out.<br>I'm gonna look for it to see if it's true though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[No really where is it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cory]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[nothin yt]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[*waits to duel-boot with OS X and XP*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[Stealth marketing or not, I'm ready baby! :-D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Borat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder if it would run on an AMD box...<br>I'd give it a try if anybody can find it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kip]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br>You've all been had. Have fun with the wild goose chase!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[john]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[give it to me quickly!<br><br>(just realized i know a developer who probably has it, uh!)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cullen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[If it's not out there yet, don't you think it will be soon?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kip]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[If anything, it's only on IRC at this point.  It doesn't appear to have shown on Bit Torrent (and probably won't until someone in Russia or elsewhere gets their hands on it) or Usenet yet.  No doubt it's being distrbuted via private FTPs and VPNs as we speak.  Does anyone use Hotline anymore?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xVariable]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hotline? How very old skool...:P I don't doubt there's a copy floating out there. Only a matter of time really.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Et Tu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow... OS X AND windows XP on my machine! im not saying no :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bjarke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[Perhaps a knockoff or some stolen samples will show up in China or in Chinatown sometime soon.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sherlockyourdoor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think it's out yet.  This would be all over the place by now, and I think it was posted on /. last night.  I've already got a mac though, so eh.  It'd be interesting to check out though, I admit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[Uh, why are we assuming this is real again?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because Steve Jobs said it was...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cory]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[People assume its real because it's on the internet and everything on the internet is real!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MDPauley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[well if anyone finds the dev copy on the net, point us in the rite direction as i know you prob cant give us a direct site or place. just a guide ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheCheeks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[Okay, you may have OSX on x86, but without any 3rd party applications even developed, yet alone compiled yet, you get mighty nice looking mp3 player/web browser.  Also by the time the real applintel boxes and OSX come out in '07 it will be obsolete.<br><br>Although if your into changing your OS more than your underwear more power to ya!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MaxMojo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[JJ: Because it is?  Seriously, 97% of the time these announcements turn-out to be true.  That alone makes it quite likely, nevermind all the other corroborating evidence.<br><br>Even if it turns-out to be bogus *this* time, though, you can be sure tomorrow's announcement will be legit.  It will be leaked sooner rather than later.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xVariable]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[BTW, don't you naysayers ever get tired of being wrong?  I mean, WTF?  Do you enjoy being the wrong-side-picking losers?  Seriously, get with it before you get another dose of crow. ;-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xVariable]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[It doesn't seem to be on IRC yet either.  This one looks bogus unless the crackers wanted to take time to do some testng before passing it off to the couriers.  Keep your fingers crossed ppl. :-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xVariable]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[didnt Steve say in his keynote speech that ALL versions of OSX can run on intel chips ? (not ness. a windows pc box .. but 1 of their intel mac's that apple have had for quite a while now)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xp2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[agree with xVariable]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sc0rian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[xVariable:<br>Alright, fair enough. I guess I just don't want to get my hopes up before I see any proof. <br><br>I like 'OS X' and I would really like to see an official, Apple-sanctioned PC version. Don't get me wrong - 'OS X' is not perfect but if Microsoft and Apple get in a 'OS X' vs. Longhorn pissing contest we all win in the end (well, as long as Apple doesn't get bought out or anything but frankly I don't see that happening anytime soon).<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[This one's bogus, folks. I can't find it on Usenet, IRC, or P2P. If ANYONE has found it, please step forward...<br><br>That's what I thought.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[as soon as I get my hands on it, I am going to burn it to cd and install it on all of my laptops.  Then I can sit next to buddy with the powerbook, and make him jealous that I have a more powerful computer, with OSX, and more features, and better aesthetics, for a lot cheaper.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[IK-47]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anyone find it on efnet?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess this is a hoax because the Intel version of OS X Tiger can not leak easily.<br><br>I dont belive that developers will get any discs or iso-s, only the developer box with the thing preinstalled. <br>Very simple and safe.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ahh the rumors]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[#25 - I think your laptops might be emitting toxic, mind-rotting gasses (or it might be the OS).  Is there any other explanation for your delusional state?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Tapanes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm glad I'm not the only one who can't find it. I thought my 1337 0day warez leeching skills were getting rusty. Now my self-doubts are being put at ease.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheGorn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[Stealth marketing? Apple makes money from hardware. how would this be stealth if they are going to LOSE sales to people with existing PCs? As an Apple shareholder I am quite uncomfortable about this whole intel switch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[matt r.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[Alright havent tried it and or downloaded it yet... Making sure everyone hears that... no lawsuits needed... but i might have seen it on oo lets say edonkey2000 and i dunno im GUESSING if it was there, it might be found by doing a search "mac os intel" ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TNY]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pshhh, ah man the post got me all excited darn, I haven't found it yet on Irc or Bittorrent.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anyone try eMule? I see a 220 meg ISO, I think that's probably way too small but I think I'll DL it anyways to check.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Suntiger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm D/L'ing *something* from eDonkey now.  It's a mere 635 MB so I'm skeptical.  I'll let you all know. =)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xVariable]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm D/L'ing *something* from eDonkey now.  It's a mere 635 MB so I'm skeptical.  I'll let you all know. =)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xVariable]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[You know the file from eDonkey 2000, says 10.3 intel. You know it should be 10.4 tiger, not 10.3 panther.<br><br>As long as i have tiger on my powerbook I'm fine.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[for a couple hundred megs itll probably be something, when my friend got a virus cause he tried downloading a new game and it was in a zip folder <one meg, i laughed at him, same goes to the MSN virus, people accepting 'pictures' that are about 2kb]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jazzay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[heh, heh, *something*. If this does turn up make sure you send it to the Hackaday tip line. Screenshots, torrents, whatever.<br>http://www.hackaday.com/tips/]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[eliot phillips]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA["as soon as I get my hands on it, I am going to burn it to cd and install it on all of my laptops. Then I can sit next to buddy with the powerbook, and make him jealous that I have a more powerful computer, with OSX, and more features, and better aesthetics, for a lot cheaper."<br><br>what crack are you on? More features? Better aesthetics?  The PowerBook is by far the best looking laptop in the market (in fact, pretty much every laptop maker out there like Dell are trying to emulate the PowerBook look), and how can a laptop running emulation on OS X softwares be superior comparing to laptops running the applications natively?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Slimmshedy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[It could quite possibly be real, I just find it interesting that it's been reported leaked, yet noone from /. has any idea where to get it (someone ALWAYS has the latest leak).<br><br>If it is real, it's propagating extremely slow.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA["Supposedly it can be installed on just about any PC box"<br><br>Surely it would have to have PowerMac/iMac/etc firmware on the BIOS to boot though...? I don't see OS X for Intel working on all chipsets from AMD, VIA, etc without beeing modified in some way.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[struddie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well here's something to think about.<br><br>So what if you can get the Tiger Intel ISO. To install in on your system, you need to have drivers, and I'm pretty sure, that the developer version will only have drivers for the equipment on that machine, so it will only work if you have the same motherboard or chipset.<br><br>Well perhaps I'm wrong, but having installed Linux, I know how complex it can get if you don't have the drivers for some specific equipment.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[arpan Chinta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[Paul (#35): You're a real out-of-the-box thinker, aren't you. *sigh*...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xVariable]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just checked EVERYWHERE and I can't find it so I don't think it's real. I read another article claiming the same yesterday and I'm not buying it. I did find this though that cracked me up!<br><br>http://www.ionicstudios.net/MacTel]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Giovanny Gutierrez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/12/os-x-for-x86-already-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just checked EVERYWHERE and I can't find it so I don't think it's real. I read another article claiming the same yesterday and I'm not buying it. I did find this though that cracked me up!<br><br>http://www.ionicstudios.net/MacTel]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Giovanny Gutierrez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 12:54AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
