<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pulled a Challenger? Besides the fact that the Challenger explosion didn't have anything to do with a rocket failure, that's just insensitive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marky Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA["In fact, it pulled a Challenger "<br><br>Oh man... that's pretty bad.<br><br>But yeah.  This sucks, I was really interested to hear about how it worked.  Hopefully they get another one up there and learn from whatever they can this time around.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[gramatically and technical wrong/right, #1 is right, that statement is insensitive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA["pulled a Challenger"?<br><br>Too soon, man, too soon.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[While yes the challenger comment is distasteful, #1 is wrong; Challenger was due to "Rocket Failure" in a roundabout sort of way. The o-ring failed and hot gas burned though the insulation of the external tank. So while it wasn’t the rocket nozzle itself, it was part of the SRB.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rombus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[#1 is right that its insensitive, but I think he got the Challenger and Columbia confused.  Columbia broke up due to a heat shield failure while the Challenger had an o-ring failure that led to a catastrophic explosion in the solid rocket boosters during lift off.<br><br>In either event the statement wasn't necessary.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Foushee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[It would have been more apt to call this 'Back to the Future'. see here]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Avaksi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[It would have been more apt to call this 'Back to the Future'. see http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0107/22cosmos1/]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Avaksi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[What is a "behicle"?<br><br>"Pulled a Challenger"?<br><br>The next time a building collapses, will it have "pulled a WTC"?<br><br>Poor taste folks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jlb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[I knew this was Barb when I read it. She said something in the past that pissed me off. But this isn't too bad. What, 1986? That's almost 20 years. I remember the "Why does NASA drink Pepsi?" (because they couldn't get 7-Up) joke was going around just days after the disaster.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think you're right. Reference removed.<br><br>Regards,<br>Barb]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[barb dybwad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[this has all the makings of a good conspiracy theory.  Suppose it did work, and the Americas did detect it correctly.  Perhaps the Russian government just wants another head start on this new technology.  <br><br>There I said it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tigerbot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hello<br>it's me, the bloke who wants to throw away your rubbish for you.<br><br>All I have to say is:<br><br>"Now why did they have to go and throw away a perfectly good umbrella?"<br><br>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!<br><br>Now look at it - it's just another piece of space junk, rubbish, garbage, trash, what have you - <br><br>and all us Earthlings can say for it is:<br><br>"We're glad that we can contribute to fill up the immense void called space with some of our own earthly rubbish for future generations to enjoy."<br><br>I am sure Douglas Adams would be proud.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bollocks Mate]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well thats what happens when you low-bid to russia, in case you didn't infer from the submarine launch with an ICBM, thats what you get, probly had lots of insurance though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[All that money into the Star-War-Defense system, and now we know that their ICBMs had 83 seconds of flight time.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Homer J]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[ISN't THAT THING THE UMBRELLA CORP SATELLITE seen at the END of RESIDENT EVIL: APOCALYPSE?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think this is a major blow to the space society.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[God forbid we had a space shuttle that could just bring the satellite up and dropped it off it seems those russian launchers arent all there cracked up to be after all]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Chance]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[I cant wait until they perfect rail guns so satellites can be shot into orbit from earth...eliminating probably the most expensive part of the whole ordeal.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[scottmcl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Star-Wars Defense system never passed congress. Or maybe it was the house. Either way, it didnt pass. It was never built.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Idontknwonothin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does localhost qualify as "another news source"?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[I feeel that russia and the united states routinely does these things, launch paylods into space and claim they where lost or destroyed. Some have claimed that this is mere smokescreen in order for this satelites to work under the black ops umbrella, you cannont seceretly launch anything into space, rockets usually make a heck of lot of noise and are quite visible, but you can publicly "lose" them by claiming they where destroyed. I feel that this is a strong possibility in this case, the russians are experts at putting stuff into space, they will not simply lose expensive euipment due to human or thechnical errors, they simply cannot afford it. No this satelite has other purposes you and I are not meant to know.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tamara Bumker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[#14<br><br>Not trying to be unpatriotic, but let's be fair about this. The US has essentially lost a lot of their functional, as in tangible, space ability.<br><br>If it weren't for Russian rockets, there'd be skeletons in the space station instead of astronauts and cosmonauts.<br><br>The shuttle program is still of questionable safety and they've had 30 years to work on it. Read the CAIB report, basically losing "only" two shuttles was incredible luck...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hiredgoonz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[If they would hurry up with the damn space elevator everything would go much more smoothly. <br>:)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cosmos 1 solar sail didn't fly]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/06/22/cosmos-1-solar-sail-didnt-fly/</guid><description><![CDATA[#22, you need caps, lots more caps, to get that really edgy, 'I forgot to take my meds last week,' style that you're trying for.<br><br>As to the subject at hand.  I remember seeing a claim, during the cold war, that something like 2/3 of all Soviet ICBMs were expected to malfunction during the boost phase*. I'm just sorry such a neat idea failed to make it into space. <br><br>*I though littering nukes across the Soviet countryside was supposed to have been *our* job, but hey, each to their own.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:23AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
