<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is that a bomb I detect, or are you just happy to see me? <br><br>Fishes,<br>narco.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[narco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[VERY cool]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hitesh Sawlani]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[#1, exactly what I thought ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[morgan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[So, my work (huge bingo club) got evacuated tonight and the police turned up. Most amusing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[what if they are just honest people and they want to use a knife for say............ sushi reasons?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jayarr_superstar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[this was really invented as a device to see through peoples clothes]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is it like a camera is it portable that would be wierd if the police had those]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[waffa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[i suddenly want to be police, investigating if those hot woman are terrorists indiscretly... lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[benhc911]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is that man carrying a dildo?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Finished.Law.School]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[i see privacy issues uprising fromt his :]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[-alex-]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[#5 Human sushi is against the law tho....and you don't make fish sushi in public lol.<br><br>#7 If you look at the site. There are pictures. Its a large thing you stand in front of. For now at least...<br><br>#8 Sorry I already signed up.<br><br>#9 Yes....yes he is...we had to arrest him...<br><br>#10 If you are a suspected terrorist you have no rights. Therefore you get no privacy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[How long until this?<br><br>http://www.foxhome.com/schwarzenegger/movies/recall1aep.mov]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Desiri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[No one should ever have to look at me through one of those.<br><br>By the same token, I would likely die of shame if someone were to be viewing me with that.  I'd be hunching through with my hands over my boobs and pubes and tin foil wrapped around my lumpy rump!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TPW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[#11 wow... so you are saying that everyone is a suspected terrorist and therefore has no rights?<br>they r ganna use this like a metal detector i'm guessing... not just some people, everyone would be checked....<br><br>i can see a few desperate horny guys willing to take that job just for the perks...lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[diverguy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[#11 "#10 If you are a suspected terrorist you have no rights. Therefore you get no privacy."<br><br>At 500 people an hour, everyone's a suspected terrorist.  Now the minimum wage security guy can see 500 naked people an hour.  So there is privacy and decency issues.  And we won't be any safer.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[__redruM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[500 people per hour is useless for the London Underground (Tube). There's probably at least a few hundred people per train at rush hour and those train run every few minutes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pfb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Re: #17 - exactly right. 500 people every 2 minutes might work. You'd need several machines for some of the busiest stations I guess. How much a pop are they though? And would tube travellers have to pay for them and the staff?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[patrick dodds]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[If I just hand them a bad photoshop image of myself can I just avoid this machine and call it even?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Asher]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, just like in TOTAL RECALL.<br><br>#12, you got it!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evan Evans]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Finding weapons? That's not the half of it... <br><br>Clearly from the picture - this screening device will be most useful in finding which people are in fact made of liquid metal, and have been sent back in time to assassinate John Connor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[When I first saw the picture, I thought that the guy on the right looked like a robot holding a knife. That's pretty cool technology anyways. I wish I could have something like that...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vivian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UK looks at Qinetiq's millimeter wave imaging for bomb detection]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/23/uk-looks-at-qinetiqs-millimeter-wave-imaging-for-bomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[One way around the privacy issue is to have the image fed to an office and unviewable to the the screener on the floor.  The person viewing would only see the enhanced image without seeing what the the person actually looks like.  If they are carrying a weapon, they call down to the floor screener and security and detain the person. If they are clean they get to go through and keep their privacy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
