<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Sandbridge Technologies develops programmable cellphone chip</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/25/sandbridge-technologies-develops-programmable-cellphone-chip/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Sandbridge Technologies develops programmable cellphone chip</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sandbridge Technologies develops programmable cellphone chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/25/sandbridge-technologies-develops-programmable-cellphone-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/25/sandbridge-technologies-develops-programmable-cellphone-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[In C ??<br>won't that make it easy to hack?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wonko The Sane]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sandbridge Technologies develops programmable cellphone chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/25/sandbridge-technologies-develops-programmable-cellphone-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/25/sandbridge-technologies-develops-programmable-cellphone-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[There is a better solution than this "chip"...  <br><br>TechnoConcepts (TCPS)<br><br>http://www.technoconcepts.com/<br><br><br>The just did a demo to big names below (LG, Samsung, etc)<br><br>http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/050714/145388.html?.v=1<br><br>Approximately 40 representatives from 16 different wireless communications companies, including ETRI (Electronic and Telecommunications Research Institute), SK Telecom, SK Telesys, LG Electronics, Inc., Samsung Venture Investment Corp., Axesstel R & D Center, Ltd., Bellwave Co., Ltd., C & S Co., Ltd., Cablerex, Inc., Hyunseo Data Communications, Ltd., Kisan Telecom Co., Ltd., Megacraft Company, Ltd., Mobianet Corporation, System Mecca Company, Ltd., as well as research and development engineers from the South Korean government viewed the demonstration.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MobileMadMan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sandbridge Technologies develops programmable cellphone chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/25/sandbridge-technologies-develops-programmable-cellphone-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/25/sandbridge-technologies-develops-programmable-cellphone-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA["the chips are programmed in the c language as opposed to assembly language, giving them a cost advantage because c developers are far easier to come by"<br><br>what? you can program any microcontroller in c, you just need a c compiler for that platform -- which invariably exists. they're just saying that they wrote their own compiler software -- which is what any startup company  expecting to make reasonable sales of their mcus would do. for the more popular, established mcus, there are even extra compiers written by enthusiasts/ resellers that allow you to write in other languages like basic. they would therefore have to write their own compiler to even have a hope of competeing.<br><br>ch424]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ch424]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sandbridge Technologies develops programmable cellphone chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/25/sandbridge-technologies-develops-programmable-cellphone-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/25/sandbridge-technologies-develops-programmable-cellphone-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think that ANY chip that pre-loads configurations, even if it covers 100% of the current available frequencies and protocols, will be outdated by the time it hits the market.  Things are changing so quick in the telecommunications industry, that this type of chip (Sandbridge) is not the Holy Grail.  We need a lower-level solution - TSR by TCPS.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MobileMadMan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sandbridge Technologies develops programmable cellphone chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/25/sandbridge-technologies-develops-programmable-cellphone-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/25/sandbridge-technologies-develops-programmable-cellphone-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[None]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Charris Jessel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:24AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
