http://www.engadget.com/2005/08/15/logitech-quickcam-fusion-adds-improved-performance-cheesy/ Engadget Comments for Logitech QuickCam Fusion adds improved performance, cheesy effects http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2005/08/15/logitech-quickcam-fusion-adds-improved-performance-cheesy/http://www.engadget.com/2005/08/15/logitech-quickcam-fusion-adds-improved-performance-cheesy/Dec 19th 2005 1:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/08/15/logitech-quickcam-fusion-adds-improved-performance-cheesy/http://www.engadget.com/2005/08/15/logitech-quickcam-fusion-adds-improved-performance-cheesy/Dec 19th 2005 1:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/08/15/logitech-quickcam-fusion-adds-improved-performance-cheesy/http://www.engadget.com/2005/08/15/logitech-quickcam-fusion-adds-improved-performance-cheesy/It looks like a new product, has anyone bought this?

Can't find anything on Logictech site about the effects yet.]]>Dec 19th 2005 1:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/08/15/logitech-quickcam-fusion-adds-improved-performance-cheesy/http://www.engadget.com/2005/08/15/logitech-quickcam-fusion-adds-improved-performance-cheesy/Dec 19th 2005 1:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/08/15/logitech-quickcam-fusion-adds-improved-performance-cheesy/http://www.engadget.com/2005/08/15/logitech-quickcam-fusion-adds-improved-performance-cheesy/Dec 19th 2005 1:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/08/15/logitech-quickcam-fusion-adds-improved-performance-cheesy/http://www.engadget.com/2005/08/15/logitech-quickcam-fusion-adds-improved-performance-cheesy/Dec 19th 2005 1:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/08/15/logitech-quickcam-fusion-adds-improved-performance-cheesy/http://www.engadget.com/2005/08/15/logitech-quickcam-fusion-adds-improved-performance-cheesy/Does it mean its 'true' 1.3M quality won't be better than the previous CCD model (QuickCam Pro 4000)?
I assume CCD sensor works much better in low light condition than CMOS sensor?]]>Dec 19th 2005 1:36AM