<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Claro TV: 102-inch glass screen, $45,000 and up</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Claro TV: 102-inch glass screen, $45,000 and up</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Claro TV: 102-inch glass screen, $45,000 and up]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sounds like a more expensive, more breakable version of a Reversa Screen. http://www.reversa.co.uk/<br><br>A 120" Reversa screen will run you £1675 ($2978), and they can make them up to 284" if you want. (I had to put British prices because that's the first link I found, I've only ever bought smaller screens from my local plastics supply shop)<br>http://www.nexnix.co.uk/reversa%20screens/reversa_index.htm<br><br>We've used smaller versions of the plastic in the Reversa screen for daytime rear-projection displays, and the image is amazing. If I could find enough room to put a projector behind one at home, I'd have the sweetest home cinema ever. I swear it looks better than HDTV (if your projector is good enough).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayson Elliot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Claro TV: 102-inch glass screen, $45,000 and up]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow! When will they stop to enlarge screens ><]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabri741]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Claro TV: 102-inch glass screen, $45,000 and up]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</guid><description><![CDATA[#1:  Am I reading this wrong, or is this for front projection applications?  The reversa seems to be for rear projection applications.<br><br>This would be apples vs oranges...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nelson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Claro TV: 102-inch glass screen, $45,000 and up]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nelson - <br><br>I'm fairly sure from what I can read about the Claro TV that it is also a rear projection system. From the first Gizmag article:<br><br>"In a standard instillation (sic) the projector sits on the floor about 5 feet behind the screen, so while the bulkiness of rear projection screens has literally vanished, it actually occupies a greater amount of space."<br><br>http://www.gizmag.com/go/3271/]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayson Elliot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Claro TV: 102-inch glass screen, $45,000 and up]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</guid><description><![CDATA[Jayson-<br><br>Your link goes to an article on their Holographic model -- Definitely a rear projection screen.  This new product seems to be front projection -- According to the Claro site (follow the link from above...), they are calling this product a "Wall mount screen" which would lead me to believe that it would work on a regular wall.  It would be a bit decptive to call it a "wall mount screen" if you need to cut a huge hole in the wall so the image can be projected on the back.<br><br>(I'm not trying to be argumentative, here -- I'm just trying to figure out the huge price differential you pointed out)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nelson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Claro TV: 102-inch glass screen, $45,000 and up]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</guid><description><![CDATA[You wouldn't have to worry about it shattering if it were made of transparent aluminum.<br><br>=]]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Claro TV: 102-inch glass screen, $45,000 and up]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</guid><description><![CDATA[Of course you could get the new DNP Super Nova and use any projector you like. Shown a CEDIA the screen, sold in the US by Screen Innovations was quite a hit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[IK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Claro TV: 102-inch glass screen, $45,000 and up]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, Nelson, you're right, it is a bit unclear. I agree a "wall mount screen" would not really be a fair description if you had to use a rear projection. Of course, "holographic TV" is kind of a misleading term, too. <br><br>No worries - I didn't think we were arguing, either. I'm trying to figure this out as well. There must be SOME reason to spend $45k instead of $3k, I just don't see enough info on the Claro TV to understand.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayson Elliot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Claro TV: 102-inch glass screen, $45,000 and up]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</guid><description><![CDATA["There must be SOME reason to spend $45k instead of $3k"<br><br>Yes - More dollars than neurons.  A condition I hope to have, someday ;-)  ...Providing it's due to an excess on the $ side...<br><br>I also wonder how much this alternative screen is:<br><br>http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000203051880/]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nelson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Claro TV: 102-inch glass screen, $45,000 and up]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/23/claro-tv-102-inch-glass-screen-45-000-and-up/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hi,<br>We are working with the "halo" film ,it is definetly front and back projection.I have worked with the Reversa screen.The "Halo" is definetly better quality.Our engineers have also developed a two way screen and "front projection" screen with no loss of image in day light.We are developing our website and our prices will be almost half compared to other retailers.We are also testing and patenting another five products unseen the world markets.Please feel freee to e mail me with any enquiries.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dea Ahmed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 1:37AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
