<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for The HairMax LaserComb</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for The HairMax LaserComb</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The HairMax LaserComb]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Uh, can I be the first one to say WTF?!?!?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adam b.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The HairMax LaserComb]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[As if it's any surprise, this appears to be a scam:<br><br>http://www.folica.com/HairMax_LaserCo_r1249_1.html<br><br>Apparently a lot of desperate people will pay $700 for a little hope...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MMT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The HairMax LaserComb]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Argh. Unless there's some surface appearance change that this thing would create, it's ridiculous. <br><br>Nice citation for the photobiostimulation though. I don't think this comb would do anything like that, unless you found a way to point it at your follicles as opposed to the hair shaft. Probably not even then.<br><br>The operative thing to remember in evaluating all advertising for hair products is that HAIR IS JUST DEAD CELLS. There's nothing that will perk them up, they're dead!<br><br>For the record, your citation says that if you hit the base of a rat's tail with a laser, it demonstrates a diminished senstivity to pain that is only partially reversible with drugs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[strat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The HairMax LaserComb]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hypoalgesia is a reduced sensitivity to pain.  Nalaxone is an opioid antagonist, a drug commonly used when someone overdoses on opioids like heroin.  Because opioids have strong pain relieving effects, administering nalaxone to even a normal person will reduce the normal, natural levels of opiates, causing them to increase their sensitivty to pain.  <br><br>It appears that higher doses have nalaxone worked only partially, while lower doses didn't work at all in reversing the hypoalgesia (insensitivity to pain).  This means that, as the article says, LPBS isn't stimulating more release of more opioids, as the release of more would have been countered by the lower dose.<br><br>Keep in mind these results were replicated with rats, so we don't know if they would have any effect on humans.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[njyoder]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The HairMax LaserComb]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[for more info about this laser therapy stuff, check out http://www.baldingblog.com/2005/08/10/low-laser-light-therapy/<br><br>its a pretty interesting read.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The HairMax LaserComb]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[#4  You seem to be a highly intelligent person with sensible, down-to-earth views which are based solely on scientific fact.  What the heck are you doing at Engadget?!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cashmore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The HairMax LaserComb]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[It wont work on hair, because hair is protien, not cells, alive or dead (despite common belief that it is dead cells, SEE #3 Strat) And that of course is assuming that it works on any kind of cell. I would also assume that this unnatural exposure would increase your chance of getting cancer. The more you screw with your cells, the more likely the will go into mitosis frenzy, or just die.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[benhc911]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The HairMax LaserComb]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[How am I supposed to make my hair silky smooth & straight??<br>My hair is coarse, fine & very delicate.<br>I've used so many products...L'oreal,Head & shoulders, VO5..<br>I don't get good results after a while my hair reverts back to its wayaward style!<br>I really wanna be my hair to be long n' good like tom cruise in MI:2<br>Help! whta product to use!<br>Thanks!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The HairMax LaserComb]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/09/24/the-hairmax-lasercomb/</guid><description><![CDATA[Believe it or not I watched a show back in August that did a 1 year research on several different methods of hair growth.  Propecia, Rogain, a laser brush, and hair transplants.  The best results were from the hair transplants but second place was actually a tie between the comb and propecia.<br><br>Personally I think $700 is a little high but since the brush is a one time expense it wouldn't be a bad deal.  Believe it or not but I doubt this thing is a scam (at least the laser brush isn't)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:06AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
