http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/ Engadget Comments for Samsung's SGH-E910 Bang & Olufsen "fashionphone" http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/
I wonder if one of those Janitors still has a penchant for rotary phones.]]>Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/
I wonder if one of those Janitors still has a penchant for rotary phones.]]>Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/
Poor choice on the part of Samsung to let B&O design the phone for them.

This is an even worse attempt at an overpriced fashion phone then the Motorola PEBL

Come on this is just not up to Samsungs usual level of excelence]]>Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/I liked it better when they called it the Gameboy Advance.]]>Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/
And notice the very birth-control-esqe layout of the key pad? I think you might be onto something....

I'm bummed. I dig B&O and this is horse$#*&]]>Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/
i would hate getting poked in the face while talking on this thing.]]>Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/
why would B&O pair up with Samsung? talk about wrong brand move.]]>Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/
-- Elias]]>Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.serenemobile.com/]]>Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/
When looking at the www.serenemobile.com I must say this product has some interesting qualities.

Looks like it could have the best sound quality, the best user interface (wheel navigation like iPOD) and best design/material quality of any mobile phone...wow...

Seriously, arent those qualities what really matters in a phone?

I'm tired of reading senseless feature focused reviews with little attention to what matters. Nobody can judge great products from just a list of features (if so, iPOD would be among the worst MP3 players). Until I can get usable convergence performance like 4 megapixel, 4GB for MP3, WiFi and PSP gaming performance I rather have a phone that can do the job well!!!]]>Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/
Bravo B&O.]]>Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/But this... the Vertus are beautiful. This one has a few interesting ideas, but I don't really like the overall design. The keys look classy... seem to be a pleasure to press, but typing a SMS appears to be quite anoying. Although I can understand the designers problem on integrating a wheel into a phones design (which seems to be a good idea). Maybe they should have gone for something like the scroll thing on Creatives Zen (or so...) and a more regular design. At least it makes sense on the B&O, compared to that old Nokia.
Hm... the more I read about it, the more I like it. I had some of the ideas aswell. But why does it has to be so THICK?! And then the sharp corners... while it may look better, it appears to me that it will be quite uncomfortable.
Anyway it looks better than the RAZR V3.]]>Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/
http://www.mobile-review.com/review/samsung-e910-serene-en.shtml]]>Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/Set to cost €1100,- here in the Netherlands.
Good thing is that they left out all the unneccessary gadgets. Why then build in a 640*480 camera?]]>Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/Dec 19th 2005 1:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/05/samsungs-sgh-e910-bang-amp-olufsen-fashionphone/
Regards,

Evan]]>Dec 19th 2005 1:06AM