<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Iomega 160GB and 250GB StorCenter NAS devices</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/18/iomega-160gb-and-250gb-storcenter-nas-devices/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Iomega 160GB and 250GB StorCenter NAS devices</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Iomega 160GB and 250GB StorCenter NAS devices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/18/iomega-160gb-and-250gb-storcenter-nas-devices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/18/iomega-160gb-and-250gb-storcenter-nas-devices/</guid><description><![CDATA[Odd thing is that's the same drive sizes they used before in the exact same thing.  I actually have a 250 and it's great as long as you can put it somewhere that dampens the sound . . . the fan can be a little loud.  Otherwise it's an awesome device.  Why use USB when you have this hooked to a WIFI router with a connection that goes just as fast as USB?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[YourNameHere]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Iomega 160GB and 250GB StorCenter NAS devices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/18/iomega-160gb-and-250gb-storcenter-nas-devices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/18/iomega-160gb-and-250gb-storcenter-nas-devices/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just as long as the price is much less than  the $500+ price of the Maxtors shown earlier today, I'll be happy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Computers.net]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Iomega 160GB and 250GB StorCenter NAS devices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/18/iomega-160gb-and-250gb-storcenter-nas-devices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/18/iomega-160gb-and-250gb-storcenter-nas-devices/</guid><description><![CDATA[You spelled "theater" wrong....theather lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[soupcancooloff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Iomega 160GB and 250GB StorCenter NAS devices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/18/iomega-160gb-and-250gb-storcenter-nas-devices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/18/iomega-160gb-and-250gb-storcenter-nas-devices/</guid><description><![CDATA[You spelled "theater" wrong....theather lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[soupcancooloff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Iomega 160GB and 250GB StorCenter NAS devices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/18/iomega-160gb-and-250gb-storcenter-nas-devices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/18/iomega-160gb-and-250gb-storcenter-nas-devices/</guid><description><![CDATA[#1-- Are WiFi (802.11g) signals really as fast as USB 2.0? I've been debating between getting external HDD and getting a NAS. My 3 yr old laptop only has single USB 1.1 port. I could buy a USB 2.0 upgrade PC card, but I haven't found one that will fit while I also have my WiFI PC card installed. If I could know for sure that the NAS solution would work just as well as a USB 2.0 external HDD, I'd be happy to eat the extra cost and go for the NAS (especially since I then wouldn't have to antje up around 50 bucks just for the USB 2.0 upgrade card.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[slip]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Iomega 160GB and 250GB StorCenter NAS devices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/18/iomega-160gb-and-250gb-storcenter-nas-devices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/18/iomega-160gb-and-250gb-storcenter-nas-devices/</guid><description><![CDATA[11g is much slower than USB2. I have the Linksys NSLU2 and I can read/write at max 15Mbits/s. USB2 can do (theoretically) 480Mbits/s.<br><br>It's ok to stream movies over wireless to your laptop, but you can't even watch a slideshow of your photos since each photo takes a couple seconds to load. I also use it to backup my laptop wirelessly every night.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[peter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Iomega 160GB and 250GB StorCenter NAS devices]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/18/iomega-160gb-and-250gb-storcenter-nas-devices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2005/10/18/iomega-160gb-and-250gb-storcenter-nas-devices/</guid><description><![CDATA[#1-- Are WiFi (802.11g) signals really as fast as USB 2.0? <br><br>No. I've been debating an upgrade as of late too. I want something I can do backups via USB 2.0 but something that also serves as a NAS for my media box. It seems usually on or the other so If you're planning on doing backups with NAS, well, 100Mb isn't going to cut it. I'd recommend the Buffalo gigabit NAS, iStation I think it's called. Anyone know if this bad boy is giga?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2005 2:37AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
