<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Samsung&#039;s Digital Photo Frame</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Samsung&#039;s Digital Photo Frame</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung&#039;s Digital Photo Frame]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll take two please.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Max v W]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2006 5:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung&#039;s Digital Photo Frame]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</guid><description><![CDATA[I prefer the design of Philip´s digital photo frame, but the networkmodule is a nice feature, at least for ?geaks like us.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrea]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2006 6:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung&#039;s Digital Photo Frame]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</guid><description><![CDATA[One question, why?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[anon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2006 6:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung&#039;s Digital Photo Frame]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</guid><description><![CDATA[Holy smokes, that this looks awesome. As does the YM-P1: <a href='http://www.samsunghq.com/content/view/27/5/'>http://www.samsunghq.com/content/view/27/5/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2006 6:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung&#039;s Digital Photo Frame]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cool, I can look at low-resolution cameraphone photos in my living room!<br><br><br><br>Wait...why would I want to do that?<br><br><br><br>Now if I could make a picture frame in my parents' house rotate through recent photos I've sent it...that would be useful (and they'd stop emailing me all the time).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2006 6:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung&#039;s Digital Photo Frame]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</guid><description><![CDATA[you can send photos to the frame via the service provider. You can also do slide show via your cell phone like a remote controller]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sunystory]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2006 6:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung&#039;s Digital Photo Frame]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</guid><description><![CDATA[I want one of those for my desk at work... wonder if I can write a little app to feed it from photos on Flickr :o)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Green]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2006 6:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung&#039;s Digital Photo Frame]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice and I would get one - but! Who wants a big SAMSUNG logo on their photo frame? that's sooo not cool.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JOHNANN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2006 6:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung&#039;s Digital Photo Frame]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why the hell are all the digital picture frames on the market STILL so ungodly expensive?<br><br><br><br>I was at Brookstone and they had ones with tiny, low res screens.  The color reproduction was terrible and you could see the thing refreshing.  Oh, and they were $200-300.<br><br><br><br>This makes no sense considering that 15" LCD's start around $130.  Surely a screen half that size with a card reader and some linux-based display software can't cost THAT much to engineer!<br><br><br><br>Personally, I bought a handful of Virgin Webplayers on ebay for $50-70 each, replaced the included OS with Windows 98 Lite, added a free screensaver that reads Jpegs from a directory, and used a cheap usb flash drive for photos.  Total cost?  $70-100<br><br><br><br>The unit has a MUCH larger screen (not sure how big, but i'd guesstimate 7-8") and works great.  The Chinese have managed to drive prices down on EVERYTHING due to their cheap labor... when are they gonna jump on the digital picture frame bandwagon?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2006 6:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung&#039;s Digital Photo Frame]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</guid><description><![CDATA[I see no real point in these digital phoeo frames unless the idea-guys actually converge its function with something else.<br><br><br><br>Like a CLOCK or calender mode, or even alarm clock with MP3 capabilites.<br><br><br><br>Mmm... mewzak to your photos... yum. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TZK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2006 8:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung&#039;s Digital Photo Frame]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</guid><description><![CDATA[Here's a 10.4" TFT photo frame for < $300, and it plays MP3 too.<br><br><a href='http://news.com.com/2061-10801_3-5884637.html<br>'>http://news.com.com/2061-10801_3-5884637.html<br></a><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[W. Lee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2006 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung&#039;s Digital Photo Frame]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really like the concept of digital frames and unlike the previous poster, I want it as sparse as possible. Just give me a classy looking frame and a place to stick my secure digital card. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bdizzle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2006 1:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung&#039;s Digital Photo Frame]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/04/samsungs-digital-photo-frame/</guid><description><![CDATA[@w. lee<br><br><br><br>That photo frame may be one of the cheapest I've seen, but it's probably the ugliest as well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brandon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2006 1:52PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
