http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/ Engadget Comments for Panasonic's 103-incher, up close and personal http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/Jan 9th 2006 4:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/Jan 9th 2006 5:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/


I'd bet they're both several orders of magnitude greater than my Panasonic projector, for the same image size.]]>Jan 9th 2006 5:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/Jan 9th 2006 5:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/


When reporting on this stuff, can you guys try and let us know? I mean 100"+ isn't very impressive if its stitched. Its insanely impressive if its a single pane though.]]>Jan 9th 2006 5:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/Jan 9th 2006 5:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/


Because you know if anyone can afford these it would have to be them, us regular humans will never see this in the living room for playing XBOX360 on, now will we. Wow I can just see PGR3, MotoGP 2006, and H3 -(halo 3) on it now...



I mean if they can drop the price to about $2500 by the year 2009 then yeah i will defiantly get one.. lol



but until then I guess i'll just wait to see them on MTV Cribs... ]]>Jan 9th 2006 5:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/


]]>Jan 9th 2006 6:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/Jan 9th 2006 7:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/Dec 19th 2008 10:05AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/


If they'd put that kind of effort into making supply meet demand, they'd have made a couple billion dollars more in 2005.]]>Jan 10th 2006 1:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/


I agree with #4. I can sit twice as close to my current 50 inch plasma, or 4 times as close to my old 26 inch TV.]]>Jan 10th 2006 4:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/
Are you on drugs??

4 x 50 = 200. Panasonic's ***103***-incher.]]>Jan 18th 2006 4:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/09/panasonics-103-incher-up-close-and-personal/
4 x 50 = 200. Panasonic's ***103***-incher."

you are an idiot...]]>Jan 19th 2006 2:15PM