http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/ Engadget Comments for Is this the Canon EOS 30D? http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/
http://web.canon.jp/Imaging/eos30d/index.html

Looks just like my 20D. =)]]>Feb 21st 2006 5:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/
Just stumbled on a canon 30d website at http://canon30d.com if you need more info on this new camera.

]]>Mar 15th 2006 12:27AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/
http://www.redopinion.com/digital-camera/category/canon/eos-30d/

_]]>Jul 27th 2006 7:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/Jan 17th 2006 11:18AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/Jan 17th 2006 11:35AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/Jan 17th 2006 11:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/Jan 17th 2006 11:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/Jan 17th 2006 12:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/Jan 17th 2006 12:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/


Won't be long till they anounce it or not though...]]>Jan 17th 2006 12:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/


I'd love to get one of these, unfortunatly, its price doest really fit in my budget.]]>Jan 17th 2006 12:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/
I don't know why that picture is being used to illustrate a story about a camera that may or may not be forthcoming]]>Jan 17th 2006 1:03PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/


It ain't a 350D Photoshop job. Everything about it is different. See here: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/CanonEOS350D/Images/NewFeatures/bodycolors.jpg



Different body shape, different name badge, different pop-up flash housing, different side for the main dial, different strap clasp, different input door cover... I mean everything.



Could be Photoshopped from something else, but not a 350D. There are lots of camera that look more like this (in a way that would be easier to Photoshop, anyway) than the 350D. You're talking a complete makeover to turn the 350D into the photo at the top here.]]>Jan 17th 2006 2:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/Jan 17th 2006 3:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/


Being smaller and lighter would make sense, as thats the direction all the dSLRs are going.



Also, the leses we're seeing there probably cost more than the camera pictured.]]>Jan 17th 2006 3:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/Jan 17th 2006 4:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/
on a side not, 30D would be a HORRIBLE name, becasue it would cause confusion w/ the previous D30.]]>Jan 17th 2006 4:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/Jan 17th 2006 5:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/Jan 17th 2006 6:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/Jan 17th 2006 7:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/>6. If it was real, it wouldn't be called the 30D. People would confuse it with the D30.]]>Jan 17th 2006 9:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/Jan 17th 2006 9:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/Jan 18th 2006 6:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/
It looks small and plasticky...but why would anyone attach a new L lens to 3000D?

Hmmmm]]>Jan 24th 2006 9:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/17/is-this-the-canon-eos-30d/Jan 30th 2006 3:50AM