http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/18/oregon-scientifics-ferrari-fmp160/ Engadget Comments for Oregon Scientific's Ferrari FMP160 http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/18/oregon-scientifics-ferrari-fmp160/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/18/oregon-scientifics-ferrari-fmp160/Jan 18th 2006 12:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/18/oregon-scientifics-ferrari-fmp160/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/18/oregon-scientifics-ferrari-fmp160/Jan 18th 2006 12:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/18/oregon-scientifics-ferrari-fmp160/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/18/oregon-scientifics-ferrari-fmp160/Jan 18th 2006 12:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/18/oregon-scientifics-ferrari-fmp160/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/18/oregon-scientifics-ferrari-fmp160/Jan 18th 2006 1:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/18/oregon-scientifics-ferrari-fmp160/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/18/oregon-scientifics-ferrari-fmp160/
Unless they can match or better existing popular products, why do these companies waste the expense & effort? geez

I guess some execs bonus was linked to getting a new product out the door..]]>Jan 18th 2006 2:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/01/18/oregon-scientifics-ferrari-fmp160/http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/18/oregon-scientifics-ferrari-fmp160/Jan 18th 2006 10:07PM