<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Cingular claims emoticon patent</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Cingular claims emoticon patent</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yet another case of the USPTO rubber stamping anything that crosses there desk, only to create work for the courts in  afew years.  RIM, anyone?<br><br>The USPTO needs to be taken out behind the barn and shot.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fuzz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 3:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[or even :?br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 3:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[Christ, learn to read.  It's an application for a patent.  It hasn't been granted yet.  Might want to actually read the farking article.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 3:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[has someone patented the wheel?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 3:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[keith coutinho]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 3:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[stupid Cingular! :@]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 3:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[#3 <br>Just an application for a patent?<br><br>"...now that the US Patent and Trademark Office has granted the company a patent for using a..."<br><br>I'm sorry, maybe my English reading skills is a little off today, but that sentence clearly states that the patent was granted not that an application was submitted.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Black Guy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[I m going to patent the way i cook KD]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Domo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 4:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[Your :-P is fine, it didn't convert to an emoticon.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Tripp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 4:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can I just say it again - FREAKIN APPLICATION.  You can submit an application for the WHEEL for crying out loud, doesn't mean it's going to be a patent.<br><br>USPTO is overburdened with a lot of crappy applications.  They're doing the best they can with the limited time and resources they have.  How about taking the LAWYERS who submit this crap out back?<br><br>(please fix your submission so it can be viewed from the main page and not merely by the people who check the comments)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 4:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe you all need to go back to grade 2 and learn how to read again.  The quoted text from the patent, clearly states a patent on using a "mobile phone (or other device) to select a displayable icon."<br><br>And, as the article stated, Cingular isn't patenting emoticons, they are patenting a method for displaying them, using macros or other keys.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 4:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[i looked at all of the links, including cellular news article, and all of them state that Cingular WAS granted a PATENT... not a Patent Application like yous guys are getting all antsy about (karl and jr; carl's jr-- i'm looking your way).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[madtracer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[#7 - follow the link in the post - it references the APPLICATION - US 2006/0015812 A1 - not a patent number.<br><br>Not saying your reading skills are at fault - just saying we should all be a little diligent before flaming or forwarding on bad info.  <br><br>Go look it up on the USTPO website - <br><br><a href='http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PG01&S1=20060015812&OS=20060015812&RS=20060015812'>http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PG01&S1=20060015812&OS=20060015812&RS=20060015812</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 4:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[CORRECT THIS POST.  The PTO has NOT, I repeat HAS NOT, issued this patent.  The article is wrong; Cingular merely applied for it.  I would not expect the PTO to "rubber-stamp" this patent -- and contrary to popular opinion, the PTO does reject patent apps all the time.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 4:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[this is so clearly pointless. the technology already existed on other systems this will so cost them money trying to defend it and in the end it will get revoked.<br><br>citing microsoft is the ultimate irony, considering how they totally ripped off apple's icon GUI decades ago and that was also patented by the way (not trying to start a historical flame war, but demonstrating a clear example of how this sort of patent will not hold water).<br><br>On a lighter note, Cingular must die.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[:o)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 4:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll patent Jebus Christ!  I'll get royalties for every sermon!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Legodude522]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 4:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[i filed a patent for alphabet.<br>soon i'll be rich...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[peecz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 5:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA["or conveys other information independent of text"<br><br>So, does that mean that Cingular's patent (or application -- I can't be arsed to read the articles) will cover speech on a mobile phone? Now that *must* have prior art!<br><br>Or will I have to pay Cingular each time I say "Yeah, I'm fine. How are you?"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 5:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[This isn't even an patent application for emoticons. . .it's for a application for a patent for a method of SELECTING emoticons.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[citrus538]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 5:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href='http://www.despair.com/demotivators/frownonthis.html'>http://www.despair.com/demotivators/frownonthis.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 5:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple couldn't really do anything about Microsoft ripping them off, when they are the ones that ripped off Xerox's Parc original GUI in the first place.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EvanWasHere]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 5:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[Next cingular will try to get patents for msg acronyms like: lol, rofl, lmao, brb, ttyl, omg, omfg, asl, stfu, ... Or even try to patent computerish geekrish talk: pwn, pwned, sux, suxxor, ...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[broke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 6:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[no way, there must be more details on this.<br>SE, has been using emoticons, so when you write :) it displays a smiley, and Samsung, SE, and LG, have little animated images too. (for anger, sadness, etc..)<br>This'll apply to US (and the 51st state UK) maybe.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Paragon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 7:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[As others have said<br> <br>1.) the patent was NOT ISSUED.  It is MERELY A PUBLISHED APPICATION.<br> <br>2.) The patent seeks claims for a device (e.g. a phone) that has PHYSICAL KEYS FOR EACH EMOTICON THAT THE USER CAN SELECT.  While this probably isn't patentable, it's not like they are trying to claim emotions for crying out loud.<br> <br>Of course, I realize FACTS have NO PLACE when software folks talk about patents.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[IPandItHurts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 7:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[whaa whaa whaa...hey, lets flame each other over stupid technicalities.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cypheros]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 9:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like Cingular has also filed a patent to confuse the fuck out or everyone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TZK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 26th 2006 10:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[I filed a patent for using the internet to display the English language.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oshean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 27th 2006 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[Reminds me of when someone tried to patent the hyperlink years ago. Forget who that was.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tiuk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 27th 2006 12:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[(Yeah, I remember that asinine hyperlink patenting scheme.  Whoever they were, they obviously died, not mourned by anyone.)<br><br>Even if it's nothing but an application, Cingular needs public flogging.  Emoticons were around on usenet before that stupid phone company was even born.<br><br>And anyway, you're all dust beneath my wheels. (rips mask off)  I'm Dogbert, and I patented the ones and the zeroes long ago. Pay up, suckers!   Bwa-ha-ha-ha-haa.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[quixote]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 27th 2006 1:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good, then maybe people will stop excessively using those damn smilies. This goes doubly (or should I say tripley) for the british who stuff as many as possible in their sentences.<br><br>Damn limeys.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[E71]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 27th 2006 10:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mad Tracer and Black Guy<br><br><a href='http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15792.php<br><br>PLAIN'>http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15792.php<br><br>PLAIN</a> ENGLISH<br><br>Posted 1-26-06, same day as the emoticon article.  Also linked to through this article. <br><br>"Update<br><br>It has been pointed out to us that this is a patent application at the moment - the patent has not yet been formally granted. "<br><br>Applications are granted numbers, because that's how things are organized.  You assign call numbers to things, particularly patents, when you have 1323985739245 of them, including applications.<br><br>End of discussion.  It's called literacy, try it sometime.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 27th 2006 11:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cingular claims emoticon patent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/26/cingular-claims-emoticon-patent/</guid><description><![CDATA[hey its for their new feature on seeing who is available to talk...<br><br>thats my guess]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 27th 2006 1:19PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
