<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for IBM announces 630 Mbit/second millimeter wave chipset</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/06/ibm-announces-630-mbit-second-millimeter-wave-chipset/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for IBM announces 630 Mbit/second millimeter wave chipset</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM announces 630 Mbit/second millimeter wave chipset]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/06/ibm-announces-630-mbit-second-millimeter-wave-chipset/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/06/ibm-announces-630-mbit-second-millimeter-wave-chipset/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe they should have ditched this and tried to make the G5 run efficiently in a laptop, instead...<br><br>Oops, too late.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Uninvisible]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 6th 2006 1:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM announces 630 Mbit/second millimeter wave chipset]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/06/ibm-announces-630-mbit-second-millimeter-wave-chipset/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/06/ibm-announces-630-mbit-second-millimeter-wave-chipset/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seems like we are wasting time chasing after 5-10% increases when that money could be spent on developing completely new technology that revolutionizes wireless speed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 6th 2006 1:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM announces 630 Mbit/second millimeter wave chipset]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/06/ibm-announces-630-mbit-second-millimeter-wave-chipset/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/06/ibm-announces-630-mbit-second-millimeter-wave-chipset/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good idea no?<br><br><br><br>Business/Financial Desk; SECTC<br>Those Cables Behind the Television May Become Obsolete<br>By JOHN MARKOFF <br>411 words<br>6 February 2006<br>The New York Times<br>Late Edition - Final<br>2<br>English<br>Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company. All Rights Reserved.<br><br>SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 5 -- A team of I.B.M. researchers plans to report this week that they have used standard chip-making materials to develop a high-speed wireless technology that could do away with the bulky cables that now connect electronic devices in the living room. <br><br>In the past, high-frequency wireless technology has generally required exotic semiconductor materials like gallium arsenide that are costly to work with and difficult to miniaturize. <br><br>On Tuesday, at an annual semiconductor industry design meeting here, the researchers are expected to describe a design that is capable of transmitting more than 10 times the data of today's Wi-Fi using lower-cost silicon germanium material. <br><br>The researchers said the new technology would be ideal for moving HDTV video signals around the home wirelessly in the unlicensed 60-gigahertz portion of the radio frequency spectrum. <br><br>This is referred to as the ''millimeter wave band,'' and it has long held out the promise of carrying far more data than other portions of the spectrum. <br><br>Moreover, because the high-frequency portion of the radio spectrum generally does not penetrate walls, it may be more palatable to Hollywood and the cable and D.S.L. telecommunications firms, which have been concerned about the risks of piracy posed by some wireless technologies, said Richard Doherty, a computer industry consultant at Envisioneering Inc., based in Seaford, N.Y. <br><br>''It might appease Hollywood, but Monster Cable would lose out,'' he said. <br><br>The use of silicon germanium is significant because it exploits standard equipment that is readily available in I.B.M. chip-making plants, according to Modest Oprysko, a manager in communication technology at I.B.M.'s Yorktown Heights research laboratories. <br><br>That means that there is potentially a relatively quick path from research to commercialization. <br><br>''This is Bluetooth on steroids,'' he said, referring to the current industry standard that has been used as a wireless cable replacement. <br><br>The I.B.M. researchers said that despite the fact that the millimeter wave technology would have a short range in the home, it might have significant applications as a low-cost alternative in point-to-point communications systems that are popular as data links on corporate campuses. <br><br>One of the advantages of the shorter wavelength systems is that the antenna can be assembled as part of the chipset, further lowering the cost of the technology. <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Motor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2006 11:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM announces 630 Mbit/second millimeter wave chipset]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/06/ibm-announces-630-mbit-second-millimeter-wave-chipset/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/06/ibm-announces-630-mbit-second-millimeter-wave-chipset/</guid><description><![CDATA[We need something to replace bluetooth.  Still sucks for most phones/headsets.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[boe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 6th 2006 12:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM announces 630 Mbit/second millimeter wave chipset]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/06/ibm-announces-630-mbit-second-millimeter-wave-chipset/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/06/ibm-announces-630-mbit-second-millimeter-wave-chipset/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seeing as "ultra wideband" is already producing working samples at an approved frequency, while this is simply a working prototype, and this will presumably use considerably more power, for 1.5x the speed which isn't needed anyway (HDDs can only sustain a fraction of that) I can't see it being a serious challenger. Also, this is the work of just IBM (the competitor has been made by a group of companies, all eager to support it) meaning it may well remain proprietary and limited.<br><br>We'll see where this goes... possibly nowhere?<br><br>ch424]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ch424]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 6th 2006 12:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on IBM announces 630 Mbit/second millimeter wave chipset]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/06/ibm-announces-630-mbit-second-millimeter-wave-chipset/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/06/ibm-announces-630-mbit-second-millimeter-wave-chipset/</guid><description><![CDATA[How about some advancements in battery technology? Wireless rocks, but only being able to use it for a couple of hours on a single charge doesn't.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tiuk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 6th 2006 1:01PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
