http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/ Engadget Comments for Video iPod fakery exposed on video http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 7:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/
I knew there was something odd about having a touchscreen. You would get fingerprints all over it.]]>Feb 26th 2006 7:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 7:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 7:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/The original picture has a "7" in handwriting on the bar code at the bottom right hand-side of the iPod. The picture at the end of the video photoshop tutorial does not. interesting. nobody else noticed that? also, it could also just be someone copying and pasting different elements of the original image into their mockup to make it look exactly the same as the original. a bit far fetched, i know... we'll see. 1 day...]]>Feb 26th 2006 7:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/
When was the last time one of these rumors or leaks was right?]]>Feb 26th 2006 7:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 8:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 8:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 8:03PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 8:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 8:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.macshrine.com/2006/02/26/total-confusion-is-the-video-fake/

also, if you look real close, at one point it does look like the touch-wheel was shopped in, and the plastic it is sitting on is somewhat suspect. the folds are exactly the same when they reverse the pod for the second picture, which seems unlikely. come to think of it, why is reversing the pod even necessary in this procedure?

whatever, though. we can wait it out for another day.]]>Feb 26th 2006 8:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 8:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 8:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 8:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 8:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 8:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 8:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 8:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/
Last October, with the iPod 5G, a rumor and leak with a photo very similar to this one that turned to be real..
]]>Feb 26th 2006 8:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b371/m00n3r/iPod6G_m00n3r.jpg]]>Feb 26th 2006 8:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/
http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/9009/look27ou.gif]]>Feb 26th 2006 8:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/


http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/1894/picture47oo.png

http://img528.imageshack.us/my.php?image=difflabel9ct.jpg

http://img357.imageshack.us/img357/5454/picture78ui.png]]>Feb 26th 2006 8:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 8:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 8:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 8:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/
Dont get me wrong i wouldnt mind if it was true but comon this has been debunked give it up]]>Feb 26th 2006 8:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 8:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 9:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/20:50] -: it was done as an example
20:50] -: i don't think they were claiming it was them]]>Feb 26th 2006 9:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 9:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Please don't let it be true! Please don't let it be true!
I have a 3G iPod and I really need to update!! When the 5G came out, I told my self "I have a good feeling the next iPod will come out around February/March, just in time for my birthday, so I'll take my chances and wait." So I waited, and then a few weeks ago there was news of a possible 6G iPod! i was soo excited! So this BETTER be a fake! Please let it be a fake!! ]]>Feb 26th 2006 9:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 9:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/
http://jbfacts.blogspot.com/]]>Feb 26th 2006 9:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 9:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 9:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/
+

http://img357.imageshack.us/img357/5454/picture78ui.png = false

The scribble in the original picture is the same as the 1 in the vid.--the german guy was just in the middle of drawing it when spacehog371 or whoever took the pic]]>Feb 26th 2006 9:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.redr.wordpress.com , and see the last post.. this is my 6G ipod.. in my desk!!]]>Feb 26th 2006 9:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/
Thanks for making iLLW!L relevant to teh intarnets!

Having created images 1 and 3; I feel so special to be brought up to a new level of obscurity!]]>Feb 26th 2006 9:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 10:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 10:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 10:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Anyway, I did a search on "lcd color test" and I didnt find that image.

I also hope its a fake. I want one]]>Feb 26th 2006 10:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 10:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 10:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/
He wasn't using google.com, he was using google.(crazy dutch url ending).]]>Feb 26th 2006 11:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/
Also, I can't seem to find that picture he used to get the lcd color test on google.]]>Feb 26th 2006 11:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Anyways if you compare the two in all the details you will find there are slight differences. The images showing the differences from the video to the original fake DO show true differences.

however yeah it could have just be redone after... but if that was the case why is SO much attention made to make it identical to the original, i would assume if i was redoing this thing there would be obvious differences rather than the ever so slightest differences. Also why if so much attention was to make the video as identical to the original why was the 7 left out?!!!!!! That’s the most odd thing, why was the 7 left out.
]]>Feb 26th 2006 11:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/


http://img160.imageshack.us/img160/1672/ipodfake3en.png]]>Feb 26th 2006 11:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/26/video-ipod-fakery-exposed-on-video/Feb 26th 2006 11:32PM