http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/ Engadget Comments for Another "video iPod" surfaces online http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/
ok, we get it.. ppl want this product.. and... although i must admit that those pictures are really well done (the screen reflection on the iPod Hifi for example) the question is why?

they already pi$$ed off hundreds of thousands of ppl who invested in a PPC iMac, why would they pi$$ off the millions who just upgraded to an iPod video? its not smart business.]]>Mar 5th 2006 3:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/
G$]]>Mar 5th 2006 3:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/
Anyway, anyone new to the discussion might want to head over to digg and see the talk going on at that place:

http://digg.com/apple/iPod_AV_-_Exclusive_Pictures]]>Mar 5th 2006 3:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/
why would they put out a commercial for pixar's rival?]]>Mar 5th 2006 3:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/they also claim that they have not reduced them
might actually be a .01% chance this is real!!!

http://www.skattertech.com/2006/03/full-screen-ipod-4-real/]]>Mar 5th 2006 3:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/]]>Mar 5th 2006 3:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/
But the dark side is all powerful.....

P.S. an Apple PMP would only be good for one thing. It'd make the prices on competitors cheaper. I saved £80 on an X5 after the 5G came out!]]>Mar 5th 2006 3:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/
All these sad little people that run around proclaiming that Apple WILL do such and such on should be taken on live TV and castrated if they are wrong. Just think, the world would be a much better place if we did that to the retards that proclaimed the iBook w/ intel, new video iPod have already been released this year. They're just invisible so you can't see them.]]>Mar 5th 2006 3:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/
Thats probably the reason why apple will not release a fully touch screen ipod. ]]>Mar 5th 2006 3:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.apple.com/ipodnano/autosync.html ) and look that notebook.
It's a HP Notebook running Windows XP.

Must be a PowerBook(or iBook, MacBook) running OS X, musn't?]]>Mar 5th 2006 3:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:32PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/
why would they put out a commercial for pixar's rival?"

It is probably a trailer. The trailer is available from Apple.]]>Mar 5th 2006 3:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/
You do know that if this is real then the clickwheel would probably disappear after a few seconds similar to when you watch a movie in windows media player on full screen and the cursor and border disappears.

Also in reply to post 4, if you look at the full size second picture you will see it is not rounded, it's just the clear layer on top that makes it look like that from the angle shown.]]>Mar 5th 2006 3:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/>4. Look at the left corner of the iPod in the second photo. The edge is consistent with all of the other photos. You just need to look carefully.

>>17. I doubt the wheel and progress bar are ever-present when viewing video. They probably appear only when the screen is touched, so that the user may access the interface if necessary. It disappears within a few seconds of removing the fingers from the screen. If you've used DVD playback software on a computer (in fullscreen mode), you should know that this mode of operation works very well.]]>Mar 5th 2006 3:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/
And unless Apple has stumbled upon I-Fusion, what's the battery life on these things going to look like? 20-30 minutes max? That's where I'm really not buying this - cause it all just looks (and sounds) far, far too good.

]]>Mar 5th 2006 3:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/
Directed at:
1) People who get their jollies creating or perpetuating hoaxes like this
2) People who get their jollies getting the "first post!" in Engadget]]>Mar 5th 2006 3:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 3:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/
Look at the thumb in the second shot, and the film grain doesn't quite match up (same in third).]]>Mar 5th 2006 3:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/
Here are links to both images:

http://images.apple.com/ipodnano/images/synctopwin20051011.jpg
and
http://images.apple.com/ipodnano/images/synctopmac20051011.jpg

The equivalent page for the regular iPod shows an iMac on a Mac, and that same PC laptop on a PC.

Anyway, I agree that these pictures seem fake. I'm also getting tired of all these (very similar) fake iPod video pictures.]]>Mar 5th 2006 4:03PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/I think it's just a 5G with a nice pic photochopped in. I hope the next photoshopper waits until apple has a nice remote and shows that being used to select files.]]>Mar 5th 2006 4:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 4:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 4:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 4:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 4:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 4:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/Mar 5th 2006 4:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/
also, everyone keeps saying that the middle of the second ipod picture looks split, but could that just be a reflection of the ceiling?


and could someone name me a camera model that you're able to take a picture with ease with your LEFT index finger?]]>Mar 5th 2006 4:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/
Dun Dun Dun...]]>Mar 5th 2006 4:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/05/another-video-ipod-surfaces-online/it says:
This Account Has Been Suspended
Please contact the billing/support department as soon as possible.]]>Mar 5th 2006 4:33PM