<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for CTO unveils next-gen &quot;Intel Core Microarchitecture&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for CTO unveils next-gen &quot;Intel Core Microarchitecture&quot;</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CTO unveils next-gen &quot;Intel Core Microarchitecture&quot;]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</guid><description><![CDATA[Better all be 64-bit. I wonder if the memron will still be 32? Core is a step backwards in this way.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cybert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2006 5:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CTO unveils next-gen &quot;Intel Core Microarchitecture&quot;]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dont worry. They are ALL 64bit - even merom.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2006 6:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CTO unveils next-gen &quot;Intel Core Microarchitecture&quot;]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</guid><description><![CDATA[the question is how will AMD answer back. I would love to see AMD kick out something new]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2006 9:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CTO unveils next-gen &quot;Intel Core Microarchitecture&quot;]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wouldn't be surprised to see this out by September.  With their incredible loss of market share, they are going to be under a LOT of pressure to recaptures something by the 3rd quarter.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[boe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2006 10:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CTO unveils next-gen &quot;Intel Core Microarchitecture&quot;]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</guid><description><![CDATA[What I want to know: are any of these are pin compatible with my iMac Core Duo? Future up grade please!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2006 10:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CTO unveils next-gen &quot;Intel Core Microarchitecture&quot;]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</guid><description><![CDATA["better than any other processor, based on data sheets published today."...TODAY is the key word in that sentence.<br><br>I bet AMD will STILL kick Intel's butt when these chips come out]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[opher]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2006 10:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CTO unveils next-gen &quot;Intel Core Microarchitecture&quot;]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</guid><description><![CDATA[@6<br><br>This would seem to argue otherwise:<br><a href="http://anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2713">http://anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2713</a><br><br>and this:<br><a href="http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=4843">http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=4843</a><br><br>AMD has a few things on the table for later this year (faster DDR2 memory ) but the memory change alone will not make up for the performance difference since AMD is already doing pretty well with memory bandwidth. AMD is going to be pushing 90nm chips for the rest of the year while Intel has moved to 65nm.<br><br>AMD will have new chips out for 2H06, but they won't have nearly the same features that Conroe brings to the table : 4 issue core, 4 MB L2 cache, fast 1 cycle SSE, etc.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Benson Leung]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2006 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CTO unveils next-gen &quot;Intel Core Microarchitecture&quot;]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</guid><description><![CDATA[ Knowing that way it is Intel is just announcing this while AMD is already finishing up something comperable to  this. Expect something in the next mo ^.~.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Veacross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2006 12:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CTO unveils next-gen &quot;Intel Core Microarchitecture&quot;]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</guid><description><![CDATA[Conroe is impressive, fo' sure.  However, AMD has 6 months to go, on top of the time since x2.  Lets not act like Intel has won any crown yet, as exemplified in the last decade (**cough**...Anandtech).  Please.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[acidreflux]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2006 10:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on CTO unveils next-gen &quot;Intel Core Microarchitecture&quot;]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/08/cto-unveils-next-gen-intel-core-microarchitecture/</guid><description><![CDATA[the real question is:  true 64 bit, or some 64 bit extensions?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[acidreflux]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2006 10:53PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
