<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Siemens SL74X $2,000 encrypted cordless phone</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/10/siemens-sl74x-2-000-encrypted-cordless-phone/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Siemens SL74X $2,000 encrypted cordless phone</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Siemens SL74X $2,000 encrypted cordless phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/10/siemens-sl74x-2-000-encrypted-cordless-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/10/siemens-sl74x-2-000-encrypted-cordless-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't DECT phones have some kind of encryption anyway?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paulo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2006 9:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Siemens SL74X $2,000 encrypted cordless phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/10/siemens-sl74x-2-000-encrypted-cordless-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/10/siemens-sl74x-2-000-encrypted-cordless-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes step out onto the street or a balcony where someone can point one of theose snazzy listening devices you see ont he sidelines fo the NFL at you and pick up the conversation.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2006 9:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Siemens SL74X $2,000 encrypted cordless phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/10/siemens-sl74x-2-000-encrypted-cordless-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/10/siemens-sl74x-2-000-encrypted-cordless-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Converstations with my girlfriend and parents are ultra secret!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2006 9:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Siemens SL74X $2,000 encrypted cordless phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/10/siemens-sl74x-2-000-encrypted-cordless-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/10/siemens-sl74x-2-000-encrypted-cordless-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[What I want to know is when is Siemens going to come out with a new 5.8 ghz cordless phone?<br><br>Are there any good forums for phones systems?  Everything else electronic but not phones.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2006 10:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Siemens SL74X $2,000 encrypted cordless phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/10/siemens-sl74x-2-000-encrypted-cordless-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/10/siemens-sl74x-2-000-encrypted-cordless-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[So basically it's a $2,000 modem, with a built-in key agreement protocol handler (that uses gross-overkill-length DH keys) that only works with other devices exactly like itself.<br><br>You know what else costs $2000, supports Diffie Hellman, has fast enough hardware to AES128 encrypt voice on the fly, and can be carried outside?  A f#$%ing dual-core laptop, that's what.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2006 11:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Siemens SL74X $2,000 encrypted cordless phone]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/10/siemens-sl74x-2-000-encrypted-cordless-phone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/10/siemens-sl74x-2-000-encrypted-cordless-phone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, get waste....  for FREE, and your set.  Check it out on source forge, the original backers of the project had to drop it, because the government didn't want them working on it...  Why?  Well, it was too secure for their liking for one...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2006 2:16PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
