<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Leica announces C-LUX 1</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Leica announces C-LUX 1</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces C-LUX 1]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks to me more like it is based on the old(er) DMC-FX9.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scoobydoo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 1st 2006 6:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces C-LUX 1]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Will a marine waterproof housing made by panasonic for a DMC-FX01 fit a leica C-lux?<br>I cannot find a housing for the leica.<br>JC]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jose caballero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2006 5:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces C-LUX 1]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Scoobydoo, the FX01 is not the first camera on the link,  it is the second one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zverg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 1st 2006 8:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces C-LUX 1]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[I doubt it's the latest Venus engine unless they have put the Venus III engine in this camera.  The FX01 has the Venus II and image quality in anything other than sunny daylight is hardly up to snuff.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 1st 2006 9:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces C-LUX 1]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually no, the FX01 uses the Venus Engine Plus LSI.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Block]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 1st 2006 9:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces C-LUX 1]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Zverg; what I meant was that this Leica looks like it is a rebranded FX9 and not an FX01. This Leica has the exact same specs as the FX9.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scoobydoo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 1st 2006 10:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces C-LUX 1]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Scoobydoo.. I have an FX9 and its body is identical down to the OIS button.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LiveSquid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2006 3:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces C-LUX 1]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's the FX01!! Not the FX9. And Engadget missed the whole point: the 28mm wide angle lens. That's why Leica want it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Androo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2006 4:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces C-LUX 1]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[C-LUX?  They should co-market with Chick-fil-a.  :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2006 7:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces C-LUX 1]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[The C-LUX 1 looks almost identical to the Lumix FX9 because it's based on the build of the FX01, which *also* looks almost identical to the FX9. Hehe. :D<br><br>If you look directly at the lens, you'll notice that the C-LUX 1 and the FX01 have that same wide angle lens (you'll notice that the shape of the lens on the two are a little more rounded than on the FX9). You can also read the lens info printed on the perimeter of the lens and notice that it's different from what's printed on the FX9.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MinceyFresh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2006 7:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces C-LUX 1]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[well only if its priced the same as the fx01 I dont see why not getting this one instead. It is better looking.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AutoDas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2006 10:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces C-LUX 1]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have the Pany FX9 and I find the images to contain a lot of noise. Hopefully the new image processor fixes that]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chico sajovic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 3rd 2006 12:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces C-LUX 1]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Typical!  I just bought a Panasonic Lumix FX7.  Looks the same as this, just wish it had all the features of the Lieca version.  Oh well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MikeWarner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 3rd 2006 6:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leica announces C-LUX 1]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/01/leica-announces-c-lux-1/</guid><description><![CDATA[when do you think i will be able to buy the leica c-lux 1?  i am really hoping it makes the retail market asap.  any thoughts?  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[j bruns]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2006 7:37AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
