<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Kodak&#039;s Bluetooth camera module</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/02/kodaks-bluetooth-camera-module/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Kodak&#039;s Bluetooth camera module</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak&#039;s Bluetooth camera module]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/02/kodaks-bluetooth-camera-module/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/02/kodaks-bluetooth-camera-module/</guid><description><![CDATA[It sounds to me like they're filing this as a component so that they don't have to get a separate license for each camera model that supports BT in the future. Makes sense to me!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ethan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2006 1:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak&#039;s Bluetooth camera module]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/02/kodaks-bluetooth-camera-module/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/02/kodaks-bluetooth-camera-module/</guid><description><![CDATA[The article is too sceptical is for me. It'll be areally useful device if Ethan's suggestion is correct.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bUSInesS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2006 3:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak&#039;s Bluetooth camera module]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/02/kodaks-bluetooth-camera-module/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/02/kodaks-bluetooth-camera-module/</guid><description><![CDATA[Um, that doesn't look like a dual lens camera to me. It looks like a camera with a centrally positioned viewfinder and a lens turned upside down. Twin lens reflex cameras are so 30s.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2006 7:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak&#039;s Bluetooth camera module]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/02/kodaks-bluetooth-camera-module/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/02/kodaks-bluetooth-camera-module/</guid><description><![CDATA[ahhh...camera porn]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 2nd 2006 7:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak&#039;s Bluetooth camera module]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/02/kodaks-bluetooth-camera-module/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/02/kodaks-bluetooth-camera-module/</guid><description><![CDATA[Err poster #3, Kodak has very recently released a dual-lens digicam so you'd be very wrong lol.  One is for telephoto and one is for wider angles, so the camera can be very slim but still have a very wide total range.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tekdemon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 3rd 2006 2:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak&#039;s Bluetooth camera module]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/02/kodaks-bluetooth-camera-module/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/02/kodaks-bluetooth-camera-module/</guid><description><![CDATA[Poster #1 has it right.  By going through the FCC process of certification on this module, they set themselves up for being able to re-use it any many future cameras.  The real news here is that they did the engineering themselves, instead of using an outside design, and that they apparently intend to support the Bluetooth standard long enough to justify the extra costs involved.  For perspective, this regulatory step alone will probably cost them upwards of six figures (in US dollars) in various testing fees.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[some guy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 3rd 2006 7:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak&#039;s Bluetooth camera module]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/02/kodaks-bluetooth-camera-module/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/02/kodaks-bluetooth-camera-module/</guid><description><![CDATA[#8, yeah, I thought of that the other night when I used one of those kiosks.  I doubt the stack will be just for kiosks, though; I'd bet it'll support printers, too, at the very least.  In addition, it'll probably be able to send pictures to computers (that's how the kiosk works, in fact; it shows up as a "send me a file" endpoint).  Even easier than EasyShare.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Stracke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2006 6:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak&#039;s Bluetooth camera module]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/02/kodaks-bluetooth-camera-module/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/02/kodaks-bluetooth-camera-module/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm hoping this will allow serial port bonding to a bluetooth gps unit streaming NMEA compatible coordinate information to add a location stamp next to the time stamp in the EXIF header.  Oh please let it be so!<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Kinyon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 9th 2006 4:26PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
