<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Toshiba&#039;s Qosmio F30 and Dynabook SS MX, CX, TX, and AX laptops</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/12/toshibas-qosmio-f30-and-dynabook-ss-mx-cx-tx-and-ax-laptops/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Toshiba&#039;s Qosmio F30 and Dynabook SS MX, CX, TX, and AX laptops</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Toshiba&#039;s Qosmio F30 and Dynabook SS MX, CX, TX, and AX laptops]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/12/toshibas-qosmio-f30-and-dynabook-ss-mx-cx-tx-and-ax-laptops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/12/toshibas-qosmio-f30-and-dynabook-ss-mx-cx-tx-and-ax-laptops/</guid><description><![CDATA[Next time you guys cut and paste a blurb about 3+ laptops- its really annoying to read it all in a single paragraph, especially when you are trying to compare. <br><br>Suggestion: at the very minimum, PLEASE indent each time you list specs for a machine.<br><br>Even better: How about a little excel-type grid showing the differences in each model? <br><br>This is just a personal preference, I think others may agree too: we'd like to know price (even putting "price n/a" lets us at least know that you tried. Same with weight. <br><br>-KL]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KL]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 12th 2006 4:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Toshiba&#039;s Qosmio F30 and Dynabook SS MX, CX, TX, and AX laptops]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/12/toshibas-qosmio-f30-and-dynabook-ss-mx-cx-tx-and-ax-laptops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/12/toshibas-qosmio-f30-and-dynabook-ss-mx-cx-tx-and-ax-laptops/</guid><description><![CDATA[agreed because not only are we particular about how the format in which the specs are written but we're way far too lazy to go look that up ourselves. i mean copying and pasting the model numbers and hitting submit would just take too long. i cant be bothered.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 13th 2006 2:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Toshiba&#039;s Qosmio F30 and Dynabook SS MX, CX, TX, and AX laptops]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/12/toshibas-qosmio-f30-and-dynabook-ss-mx-cx-tx-and-ax-laptops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/12/toshibas-qosmio-f30-and-dynabook-ss-mx-cx-tx-and-ax-laptops/</guid><description><![CDATA[I appreciate the info that is posted here but there are certain things that I alway look for that the posters may not know are important to many users - <br><br>Laptops -<br>processor(s) speed (range if they have choices)<br>screen size<br>weight<br>Everything else is just gravy - configurable e.g memory<br><br>Screens (PC displays)<br>size<br>response time<br>contrast<br>brightness if they offer<br><br>pda phones<br>OS<br>dimensions<br>BT version - 1.1, 1.2, 2.0...<br><br>Hard drives<br>size<br>interface<br><br>LAST but not least - price and release date for all would be helpful.<br>RPM<br>access time (yes not fully indicative but better than nothing)<br> <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[boe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 13th 2006 3:55AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
