http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/bandos-beolink-wireless-1/ Engadget Comments for B&O's BeoLink Wireless 1 http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/bandos-beolink-wireless-1/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/bandos-beolink-wireless-1/
http://www.bang-olufsen.com/web2/systems/product.asp?section=systems&sub=ls&ProdID=33]]>Apr 14th 2006 5:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/bandos-beolink-wireless-1/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/bandos-beolink-wireless-1/Apr 14th 2006 5:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/bandos-beolink-wireless-1/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/bandos-beolink-wireless-1/Apr 14th 2006 9:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/bandos-beolink-wireless-1/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/bandos-beolink-wireless-1/
It's true some of their products are of good quality and seem to be very durable compare to normal gear, and at times like in the case of their telephones are unique in their own style.

An audio or video product regardless of the manufacturer or manufacturing method does not have to be priced base solely on design.]]>Apr 16th 2006 7:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/bandos-beolink-wireless-1/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/bandos-beolink-wireless-1/http://www.olive.us) ? Or is it more like the Sonos systems (http://www.S0N0S.COM) ?]]>Dec 20th 2006 2:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/bandos-beolink-wireless-1/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/bandos-beolink-wireless-1/Sep 3rd 2007 11:21PM