<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Treo launch rumor adds a price: $399 / $499</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/15/treo-launch-rumor-adds-a-price-399-499/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Treo launch rumor adds a price: $399 / $499</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Treo launch rumor adds a price: $399 / $499]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/15/treo-launch-rumor-adds-a-price-399-499/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/15/treo-launch-rumor-adds-a-price-399-499/</guid><description><![CDATA[My friends, this post was pure trash. I expect a little juice from the posts here. Not a drop here my frinds, not a DROP. TFN.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Urn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 15th 2006 3:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Treo launch rumor adds a price: $399 / $499]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/15/treo-launch-rumor-adds-a-price-399-499/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/15/treo-launch-rumor-adds-a-price-399-499/</guid><description><![CDATA[Normal posts Urn. If you don't like them forget about this site]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Horse Race r]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 15th 2006 12:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Treo launch rumor adds a price: $399 / $499]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/15/treo-launch-rumor-adds-a-price-399-499/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/15/treo-launch-rumor-adds-a-price-399-499/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nah, pipe down cupcake. The truth of the matter is most posts on engadgetmobile are more then just rumors laced with colored rumor sprinkles. Why would anyone forget a fantastic site over one weak post. I simply prefer the bar raised a bit.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Urn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2006 12:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Treo launch rumor adds a price: $399 / $499]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/15/treo-launch-rumor-adds-a-price-399-499/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/15/treo-launch-rumor-adds-a-price-399-499/</guid><description><![CDATA[Okay, how much different could this phone possibly be from the Treo 650 for Verizon?  <br><br>They may add bluetooth 1.2, may add EV-DO compatibility, and will certainly upgrade the camera, but will it be that much better? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PetRiLJoe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 17th 2006 3:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Treo launch rumor adds a price: $399 / $499]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/15/treo-launch-rumor-adds-a-price-399-499/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/15/treo-launch-rumor-adds-a-price-399-499/</guid><description><![CDATA[You said it G. We all talkin 'bout demanding higher standard. We are fans waiting for the team to deliver again.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Urn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 21st 2006 5:11AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
