<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wish I were rich. this thing can be ecpected to be $100,000 or more. :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Raymond]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2006 6:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[7.5 x 4.2 x 8.5-foot plasma?<br><br>So its a box then?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2006 6:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mat, er, fixed that to read 8.5-foot diag. Thanks.<br><br>Thomas]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2006 6:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[It ain't<br><br>"7.5 x 4.2 x 8.5-foot plasma?"<br><br>So its a box then?<br><br>It's <br><br>"7.5 x 4.2-foot (8.5-foot diagonal) plasma"<br><br>So it's a telly !<br><br>remember the process<br><br> - think<br> - write<br> - read<br> - correct<br> - post<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[blzeebub]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2006 7:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Panasonic's 1080p HD high-speed pixel drive<br><br>read this <a href="http://www.hdtvexpert.com/pages_b/reality.html">http://www.hdtvexpert.com/pages_b/reality.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[UKMuFFiN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2006 7:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[blzeebub see comment 3.<br><br>Maybe you should run me through your magical process again?<br><br>:P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2006 8:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[it weighs 400 lbs damnnnnnn]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bedpanjohn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2006 9:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Probably will cost a kidney and second mortgage. I'm in. Now where to put this thing...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Udayan Tripathi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2006 9:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[and you need a nucluar powerplant]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dollyking]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2006 10:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ahh...buu...uuuuhh...mmmmmuhhh...neaaah...*seisure* *passes out*<br><br><br><br><br><br><br>ps. anyone have any idea the power this thing draws?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Timerider]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2006 10:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where is the picture of the damn salad they always show?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Huh?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2006 11:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder how many aligators were killed to make that boot. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[My Name? Why?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2006 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Here's an idea. Imagine a cinema which had 50+ different screens, each screen had only 40 seats, and there was no set time for a show to occur. <br><br>When you went to the cinema, they'd tally up how many people wanted to watch a specific film and then when it reached a threshold (say 25), then they'd send you to one of these screenings and start your selected movie!<br><br>A screen like this would pay off really quickly, instead of all those empty seats when the film has run it's course. Of course it'd be good to have a couple of big screens around, but just think of the possibilities.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Idea?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 19th 2006 2:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[so figure 100K for the set. plus rewireing your house for the amperage it draws. plus sunglasses for the excessive brightness plus the frustration of dead pixels and replacing it once or twice.. not to mention blowing up HD 1080p to 103" so it looks as creappy as SD on a 27" set. That's how many films at the cinema at 10/pop? crazy man just nuts.  ludicris actually. they will laugh all the way to the bank on the suckers that buy this thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom acito]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2006 12:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is good news...if they weren't pulling our legs for more publicity and hype... That photo from CES with no consumer-style bezel {compare to LG's and Samsung finish products} does give indication this will be for the CEDIA channel-type of installer showrooms only. I can't really imagine it selling in a BrandsMart U.S.A. or Circuit City looking like that. <br><br>It will be very nice if Panasonic design a bezel, speaker sets and a table stand similar the the PX600 series of normal size plasmas and set it with the other Vieras. I wonder if this sudden rush into production and distribution have anything to do with the upcoming 80" Samsung and/or the World Cup?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Perrey Z.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2006 2:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[I asked my Friend Jyunko over at Panasonic's Japanese headquaters and this thing is a definetely a go., she claims price will be in the Yen 5,870,000. and Yen 8,780,000. that's around U.S.$50,000 and $75,000ish. <br>It weights a whopping 384-LBS., have 9-6" fans and only have 3 dedicated digital connections., nothing like RF coaxial, S-Video or Composite. consumes no more than 700-Watts at 50-Hz., now the bad news is, it's not stich, but it's NOT A SINGLE SHEET OF GLASS either, but 4-panels "blended" together. Again, NOT STICH but blended!<br><br>Manufacturing is currently in process at Matsushita's newly PDP plant. The bad thing is this will be targeted to large commercial applications such as sport arenas/venues, university halls, airports, car dealerships etc. so that explain the simple aluminum bezel and the connections. I asked her about the posibility of producing a consumer-friendly version for next year's high-end 1080p line-up and she said, that will be impossible due to many logistic factors. Perfectly understandable, but still we can all dream of having such a monster in our home theater rooms.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Perrey Z.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 21st 2006 1:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Panasonic&#039;s 103-inch plasma shipping this year]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/panasonics-103-inch-plasma-shipping-this-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[if u pay me 10000 i will give u one]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tou]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2007 11:59PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
