http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/ Engadget Comments for http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/Apr 19th 2006 2:17AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/Apr 19th 2006 2:28AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/Apr 19th 2006 2:38AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/i dunno why people even use blackberrys you can now run the same email service on a treo the treo is best smart phone in my opinion...]]>Apr 19th 2006 2:40AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/Apr 19th 2006 2:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/
http://www.geocities.com/bobthesnoman/]]>Apr 19th 2006 3:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/Apr 19th 2006 5:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/
It depends on your needs.

Now, if the first 5 people who posted, would never do that again, there can be some order and intelligence brought to the comments area.

Thanks.]]>Apr 19th 2006 6:19AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/Apr 19th 2006 6:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/Apr 19th 2006 7:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/
never really liked the keyboard on the Treo 600 or 650 (our atty's at work all have them and we get to support them too!), too small for me and i have small hands..

as for emails, goodlink clients on an exchange server will work just like a Blackberry and better... :)]]>Apr 19th 2006 7:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/Apr 19th 2006 7:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/
Thank goodness they got the operation design figured out better than anyone else.]]>Apr 19th 2006 8:04AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/
Last time I mentioned WiFi some knucklehead climbed all over the comment. I think it's a real need and if HTC can do it, anyone should be able to if they have the technical chops. Let the user deal with battery life issues if they choose to use the feature. But without it, I'm sticking with all things HTC. My SP3i and SP5m have been the best smartphones I have ever owned.]]>Apr 19th 2006 8:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/
Instead of the forum link, Treonauts had the first blog post about these pictures.

http://blog.treonauts.com/2006/04/first_real_treo.html]]>Apr 19th 2006 8:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/>3. 240x240 display? Why the downgrade from the 650 display?

Have you been living in hole for the last year? Windows Mobile doesn't do 320 x 320. The current wondows mobile treo - the 700w - is also 240x 240, so this is not a downgrade. The Palm OS 650 is 320 x 320 (and the Palm OS 700p will also be 320 x 320) - there will be no downgrade to 240 x 240 for the Palm OS version.

BTW: the Motorola Q DOES suck (my company has had 1 for a few months now for dev purposes). And to the guy who says that it is an apples and oranges comparison because the motorol Q is Smartphone versus treo which is Pocket PC: while i would sort of agree, the fact is that MS has tried very hard to obliterate the line between both - both are offically called "Windows Mobile" now and do not even differentiate in their title - so it is purely a matter of geek site making the distinction now. Also: the fact is that it is exatly thye same market - comments here confirm that people consider it competition (along with Blackberrys).]]>Apr 19th 2006 9:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/
Right now Cingular lags horribly in their 3G rollout.

]]>Apr 19th 2006 10:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/Apr 19th 2006 10:44AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/
Are you blind? That thing is hideous! My Treo 600 CDMA is probably the nicest looking Treo to date, even with the antenna.

http://web.palm.com/promos/images/partnerimages/treo600_sprint_cdma.jpg]]>Apr 19th 2006 10:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/Apr 19th 2006 11:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/
I think the 240x240 screen is a limitation of Windows Mobile. The same thing happened with the 700w; for some reason, WM5 can't handle 320x320, even though it can do 320x240 just fine.

And I would submit that "tried" in lieu of "tired" would actually be somewhat harder to find, because it won't show up in most spelling/grammar checks.]]>Apr 19th 2006 1:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/
Second, Motorola Q has great form factor, but lack of touchscreen means no mobile slingplayer and that is a deal breaker for me. I want my slingplayer TV!



]]>Apr 19th 2006 2:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/19/treo-hollywood-sighted-for-reals/Apr 19th 2006 10:59PM