http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/ Engadget Comments for Future flying in Hamburg, Germany http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/Apr 23rd 2006 12:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/Apr 23rd 2006 1:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/other than that, after this, there will be actual room in an airplane.]]>Apr 23rd 2006 1:38AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/Apr 23rd 2006 1:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/
It's sad that the aerospace industry has not really commercialized faster planes. With the exception of the now discontinued Concorde, flying time has not really changed in the last 10 to 15 years. The Concorde itself shows that the technology is readily available. But I guess a struggling airline industry and soaring gas prices may be reasons why companies are not investing into developing faster planes for commercial use.

Nice big leather seats with nifty gadgets may be luxury flying. But getting half way around the world in 5 hours is really first class.]]>Apr 23rd 2006 2:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/Apr 23rd 2006 3:28AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/Apr 23rd 2006 5:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/Apr 23rd 2006 5:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/Apr 23rd 2006 5:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/Apr 23rd 2006 7:31AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/
Either that, or the person responsible was snorting crack when writing the article. One or the other.

Stop whinging about the proofreading, and start whinging about the airline revenue stream of more chumps per plane. I dig the new stuff...I want the Virgin Business class available for my Syd-Lax flights when I actually get to take them...


What do we want?...More room for the chumps...when do we want it? Now!]]>Apr 23rd 2006 7:49AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/Apr 23rd 2006 9:25AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/Apr 23rd 2006 10:00AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/Apr 23rd 2006 11:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/It's suggesting that you dont need to just register to get in, you have to register to achieve the opportunity to register to get in.]]>Apr 23rd 2006 12:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/
Which is just a bunch of bull since they can't even ditch one row of seats so that my arms don't have to fall asleep for lack of room. Pretty sad when your average movie theater seems downright roomy when compared to an airline flight.]]>Apr 23rd 2006 12:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/Apr 23rd 2006 12:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/
http://businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/mar2006/gb20060330_075258.htm

]]>Apr 23rd 2006 1:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/On long flights to the other side of the world I want to lay down. How about seats that convert to bunk beds? The airlines could stack us. It worked on slave ships... ]]>Apr 23rd 2006 4:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/Apr 23rd 2006 11:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/]]>May 2nd 2006 12:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/23/future-flying-in-hamburg-germany/Jun 7th 2007 8:16PM