<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Hitachi and Mitsubishi have HD DVD-R/RW media on the way</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Hitachi and Mitsubishi have HD DVD-R/RW media on the way</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hitachi and Mitsubishi have HD DVD-R/RW media on the way]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</guid><description><![CDATA["The 15GB HD DVD-R media should go for about $17.75, which doesn't seem much of a value compared to the $20 Blu-ray discs,"<br><br>Uh, for that matter, the $0.20 4.7GB DVD-R discs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TIMMAH!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 8th 2006 11:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hitachi and Mitsubishi have HD DVD-R/RW media on the way]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am not familar with HD, but aren't most movies longer than 75 minutes?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 8th 2006 11:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hitachi and Mitsubishi have HD DVD-R/RW media on the way]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</guid><description><![CDATA[It would be rediculous to even think about burning movies to a medium that cost as much as it does to just buy the movie flat out. And of course there's always DIVX, Xvid and other compression formats that would do away with the size real quick. <br><br>But I agree with the poster above...at $.20 for a 4.7GB DVD-R these are far from being practical or even useful for the average Joes Data Storage needs. <br><br>Hard Drives are way cheaper & faster and way more compatible and easily portable to other computers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 8th 2006 11:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hitachi and Mitsubishi have HD DVD-R/RW media on the way]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</guid><description><![CDATA[So, I might be bad at math, but from my extensive calculationsbased on the values in the article, the Blu-Ray-disc costs less per gigabyte of storage space.<br><br>So, where's all the people crying about how Blu-Ray is sooooo much more expensive that you'd have to include your first-born in the deal to get a Blu-Ray-disc?<br><br>HD-DVD ($/GB): 1,1833... and even more '3's<br>BD-Disc($/GB): 0,8<br><br>Less cost is regularly what is considered "cheaper", the defenitions may have changed since I last looked it up though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KawF]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 8th 2006 11:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hitachi and Mitsubishi have HD DVD-R/RW media on the way]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</guid><description><![CDATA[#2:<br>Movies will surely be on 30gb discs, just like DVDs are on 8 gb discs, not 4.<br><br>...and dual layer burners will be expensive, just as dual layer media will be equally expensive. I think its on purpose, just to fuck with people who want to safety copy their media. This is also a reason why I hope blue-ray will win.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[0ndsk4]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 8th 2006 12:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hitachi and Mitsubishi have HD DVD-R/RW media on the way]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well honestly neither format is all that cheap. Blu-Ray has the advantage in that it was designed from the beginning as a recording forma holding 23GB. A few tweaks here and adding software layers for movie disty and bam..you have a new format. <br><br>HD-DVD started life as a ROM based format so it's pathway to recording a wee bit longer. I'm not so sure either format is really that much of a necessity for consumers who rarely generate 15GB of new content to backup a day unless they are doing some naughty things. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hmurchison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 8th 2006 1:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hitachi and Mitsubishi have HD DVD-R/RW media on the way]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hate to do this to youse guys, but you REALLY should read the press release. Both Hitachi and Mitsu are doing both HD and BD. Impress Watch might have been a little biased towards HD or their post was to focus solely on HD-DVD, but if you look at the companies' websites, you'll see they offer both BD and HD. On top of that, Maxell is releasing info about the DL and RE versions too. <br><br>Kinda makes the whole statement about HD beating out BD moot, eh? This would even warrant a post title change.<br><br>BTW, Maxell = Hitachi? If not, edit, edit, edit!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 8th 2006 1:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hitachi and Mitsubishi have HD DVD-R/RW media on the way]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</guid><description><![CDATA["The 15GB HD DVD-R media should go for about $17.75, which doesn't seem much of a value compared to the $20 Blu-ray discs,"<br><br>Ummm... The $1000 Blu-Ray player does not seem like much of a value compared to the $500 HD-DVD player...<br>Am I missing something?<br>:p]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DLoney]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 8th 2006 4:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hitachi and Mitsubishi have HD DVD-R/RW media on the way]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why does everyone assume that these prices are etched in stone and will never change?<br><br>Does anyone here remember how much recordable CD media cost when it was introduced? How about recordable DVD media?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 8th 2006 7:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hitachi and Mitsubishi have HD DVD-R/RW media on the way]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</guid><description><![CDATA[So if dual-layer HD-DVD = 150 minutes, many blockbusters will need a disk swap and every movie will need a separate disk for bonus features? Quality.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wanderer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 8th 2006 7:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hitachi and Mitsubishi have HD DVD-R/RW media on the way]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</guid><description><![CDATA[The 75 minutes is based off of a 25Mbps datarate (most likely MPEG2). The Japanese seem enthralled with that datarate so I wouldn't be surprised to see them standardize on that as the base.  However with High Efficiency codecs 18Mbps is easily equivalent in quality and that would give you just under 2hours of recording. <br><br>Like DVD there is no set datarate so rating media by mintues makes little sense. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hmurchison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 8th 2006 7:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hitachi and Mitsubishi have HD DVD-R/RW media on the way]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/hitachi-and-mitsubishi-have-hd-dvd-r-rw-media-on-the-way/</guid><description><![CDATA["Ummm... The $1000 Blu-Ray player does not seem like much of a value compared to the $500 HD-DVD player...<br>Am I missing something?"<br><br>You missed the $500-$600 PS3, which is a fully featured BluRay player, among other nice features, unlike the feature stripped $500 HD-DVD players...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2006 3:45AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
