http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/12/intel-and-ti-brag-about-chip-tech-advancements/ Engadget Comments for Intel and TI brag about chip tech advancements http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/12/intel-and-ti-brag-about-chip-tech-advancements/http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/12/intel-and-ti-brag-about-chip-tech-advancements/Jun 12th 2006 4:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/06/12/intel-and-ti-brag-about-chip-tech-advancements/http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/12/intel-and-ti-brag-about-chip-tech-advancements/
They've also fabbed at 32nm.]]>Jun 12th 2006 4:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/06/12/intel-and-ti-brag-about-chip-tech-advancements/http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/12/intel-and-ti-brag-about-chip-tech-advancements/Jun 12th 2006 5:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/06/12/intel-and-ti-brag-about-chip-tech-advancements/http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/12/intel-and-ti-brag-about-chip-tech-advancements/Jun 12th 2006 5:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/06/12/intel-and-ti-brag-about-chip-tech-advancements/http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/12/intel-and-ti-brag-about-chip-tech-advancements/That's a joke. It's (possibly) in reference to the facts that AMD (often) makes better and cheaper chips and that this whole business is seeming more and more outrageous (22nm = really dang small). Also, that would make this an all-out competition between 3 of the biggest chipmakers.
Alas, it seems that was, as of yet, fictional (as Brian from Texas has observed).]]>Jun 12th 2006 5:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/06/12/intel-and-ti-brag-about-chip-tech-advancements/http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/12/intel-and-ti-brag-about-chip-tech-advancements/AMD bosses should pay more attention to media promotion if they want to put up a serious challenge to inter.]]>Jun 12th 2006 6:28PM