<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for DALSA ships 111 megapixel CCD</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for DALSA ships 111 megapixel CCD</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DALSA ships 111 megapixel CCD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</guid><description><![CDATA[What size would the image be? Data wise]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan Ribas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2006 2:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DALSA ships 111 megapixel CCD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Assuming 32 bits/pixel and no compression it would be 425 MB.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lyle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2006 2:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DALSA ships 111 megapixel CCD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thats crazy. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan Ribas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2006 2:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DALSA ships 111 megapixel CCD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bluriest picture of a wafer I have seen in a long time. Is that a 300mm? I doubt it. At my lab we still work with 100mm , and I know how difficult it is to make photos of shiny objects.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cyberdork]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2006 2:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DALSA ships 111 megapixel CCD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</guid><description><![CDATA[lol, you'd think a company that makes CCDs could take a good picture, right?<br><br>Most digital cameras have an autofocus that cant determine a reflective surface from the object that is being reflected.  Similar to taking a picture through a window, will the camera focus on what's outside (perhaps 30m away), the dust on the glass (perhaps 1m away), or the reflection of you in the glass (assuming glass is 1m away, youre reflection is effectively 2m away from the camera)?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scabies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2006 3:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DALSA ships 111 megapixel CCD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</guid><description><![CDATA[This would be great in a family digi cam. A 1GB card can only hold 2 pictures, long download times and the computer cannot show the image. Ok maybe not then...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2006 3:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DALSA ships 111 megapixel CCD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</guid><description><![CDATA[At 8 bits per channel, the file size would be 319 megs and at 16 bits per channel will give you a 638 meg file! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2006 3:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DALSA ships 111 megapixel CCD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Considering the CCD is 4in, I would say that wafer is a 6in.  Not un-common for low volume IC manufacturing.  I'd be more interested in knowing what the pixel size is on that chip.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Redman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2006 3:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DALSA ships 111 megapixel CCD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mamiya hasn't left the game. check your facts.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2006 4:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DALSA ships 111 megapixel CCD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</guid><description><![CDATA[it says 4-inch-square, so one side of that CCD is 2 inches... the wafer would be 3 inches across...<br><br>but you right, wonder 'bout pixel size...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yubastard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2006 5:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DALSA ships 111 megapixel CCD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Considering the wafer is a flat and not a notch its definatly not a 300mm, I would have guessed a 200mm but it really looks to small to be an 8" so I would say a 6"<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cobra Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2006 5:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DALSA ships 111 megapixel CCD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mamiya has only sold parts of its overseas ventures to another company, cosmos digital.  they haven't quit the camera business.  In fact they got rid of extra services in their lineup to focus more on cameras.  This is straight from the president of MAC group.  I use Mamiya's extensively and know for a fact that they aren't going anywhere.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kris Payne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2006 7:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DALSA ships 111 megapixel CCD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</guid><description><![CDATA[You know, in your tags, you spelled Naval as Navel. What's up with that? :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian. Carpenter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2006 8:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DALSA ships 111 megapixel CCD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</guid><description><![CDATA[I had to google "u.s navel observatory" to make sure our government isn't researching navel lint nowadays! It wouldn't have surprised me at all, but no, it's just your spelling.<br>I wouldn't have said anything, but you spell it that way twice!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Edgar Valderrama]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2006 10:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DALSA ships 111 megapixel CCD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</guid><description><![CDATA[yubastartd, There is a difference between <br>"4 inches square" and "4 square inches" ...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Burns]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 20th 2006 4:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DALSA ships 111 megapixel CCD]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/19/dalsa-ships-111-megapixel-ccd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thanks to Moore's Law, it shouldn't be too long before that 4 inch square sensor will be reduced in size enough to fill a medium format back nicely.<br><br>I'm going to have to upgrade my computer to handle the files.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sacramento Photographer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 20th 2006 7:45PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
