<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Fujitsu Siemens releases Q2010 Lifebook</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/fujitsu-siemens-releases-q2010-lifebook/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Fujitsu Siemens releases Q2010 Lifebook</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fujitsu Siemens releases Q2010 Lifebook]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/fujitsu-siemens-releases-q2010-lifebook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/fujitsu-siemens-releases-q2010-lifebook/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder how this compares to the dell d420 that was announced earlier today]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[docnesh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 20th 2006 9:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fujitsu Siemens releases Q2010 Lifebook]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/fujitsu-siemens-releases-q2010-lifebook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/fujitsu-siemens-releases-q2010-lifebook/</guid><description><![CDATA["3-cell 1.75-hour battery" Is that accurate?  It seems like 1.75 hours as advertised would mean that you'd be lucky to get one and a quarter out of it.  Unimpressive!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AUA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 20th 2006 9:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fujitsu Siemens releases Q2010 Lifebook]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/fujitsu-siemens-releases-q2010-lifebook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/fujitsu-siemens-releases-q2010-lifebook/</guid><description><![CDATA[I actually think that the MacBook is the most desirable laptop, but mainly based on looks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 20th 2006 9:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fujitsu Siemens releases Q2010 Lifebook]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/fujitsu-siemens-releases-q2010-lifebook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/fujitsu-siemens-releases-q2010-lifebook/</guid><description><![CDATA[if it had cmda built in i would have bought it....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 20th 2006 9:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fujitsu Siemens releases Q2010 Lifebook]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/fujitsu-siemens-releases-q2010-lifebook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/fujitsu-siemens-releases-q2010-lifebook/</guid><description><![CDATA[The battery life is not that long at all and would have been better if it had a core duo processor but then again that would knock the battery life down further.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheap Laptops]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 20th 2006 11:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fujitsu Siemens releases Q2010 Lifebook]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/fujitsu-siemens-releases-q2010-lifebook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/fujitsu-siemens-releases-q2010-lifebook/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was truly counting down the days for the launch of this machine.  I really was eager to place my order.<br><br>Then, when going through the specifications, the $1999 base model can only take 512MB of RAM max... Ouch, that hurt.<br><br>The higher end model that supports 1GB is $3299 (not including tax), which is simply prohibitve for me.<br><br>I'm in such big dilemma now whether I shoud follow my desire of getting this exquisite toy (the base model), or if it would be a mistake due the RAM limitation.<br><br>What do you guys think?<br><br>PS:  for me.. buying a laptop above 2.3 pounds beats the purpose of paying a high premium for the form/weight factor which I'll gladly pay for, so don't suggest other models above this weight mark (Panasonic's R5 is a good contender, then again, it can only be purchase through an importer and has a lesser processor speed--- don't know what to do).<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rafa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 20th 2006 2:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fujitsu Siemens releases Q2010 Lifebook]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/fujitsu-siemens-releases-q2010-lifebook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/fujitsu-siemens-releases-q2010-lifebook/</guid><description><![CDATA[the merom based laptops are due before school starts. you will see a nice jump in laptop performance. along with some new motherboards. I really was waiting for this laptop also... turned out to be a big disappointment. Narrowed it down to this , ibm X60s, or the Sony Tx. really like the sony since it is tiny with a cdrom drive. In the meantime just waiting for the new thinkpads or sony laptops...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 20th 2006 3:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Fujitsu Siemens releases Q2010 Lifebook]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/fujitsu-siemens-releases-q2010-lifebook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/fujitsu-siemens-releases-q2010-lifebook/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm in the same dilema myself... I ride a train daily and want something I can use with my cellphone viea pdanet.  I was considering the Sony UX-50 but I decided I wanted a traditional notebook form factor... I too was drooling over some of the panasonic subnotebooks based on battery life over at dynamism.org.  Alas I am leery of buying through an importer like that.  I am now deciding between one of the Vaios, the new Dell subnotebook announced today, this machine.  Despite all this, the macbook is still a contender based on its attractive price/performance ration even though its hardly classified as a subnotebook.<br><br>Any advice on other models to consider is appreciated.  Thanks in advance]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[docnesh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 20th 2006 3:22PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
