<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Casio introduces 7.2 megapixel Exilim EX-Z70</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Casio introduces 7.2 megapixel Exilim EX-Z70</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio introduces 7.2 megapixel Exilim EX-Z70]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder if the resolution is going to be better than previous models.  I know that my Z50 was a little lacking on res quality.  Big screen, poor quality.  I will say that I've taken my Elixim down to 105ft when I went scuba diving and it took good shots.  Very slow between macro shots but usable.  It was especially nice when I switched it to video mode.  You could hear my SCUBA regulator.  And yes, I had it in a Casio UW housing.  :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BiggusDiccus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 22nd 2006 11:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio introduces 7.2 megapixel Exilim EX-Z70]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmmm... I have the Casio EX Z-750 with the same resolution - came out a year ago.<br><br>Same stats, minuse the little joystick thingy, and mine has a viewfinder.<br><br>I can't see how this is much of an improvement, unless the innards differ.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[umijin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 22nd 2006 11:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio introduces 7.2 megapixel Exilim EX-Z70]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</guid><description><![CDATA[Casio seems to make great cameras but they are going to hurt themselves if they continue to release so many similar cameras.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 22nd 2006 11:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio introduces 7.2 megapixel Exilim EX-Z70]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm still having trouble understanding why a camera like this needs 7+ megapixels. I'm sure it's directly related to the general public's idea that more MP automatically relates to better quality pictures. <br><br>I realize that more data means better quality when you get into the digital zoom range, so that's a plus, but other than perpetuating the mine's bigger than yours, this looks like a nice little camera to carry around Disneyland or other vacation destination.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sacramento Photographer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 22nd 2006 12:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio introduces 7.2 megapixel Exilim EX-Z70]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sacramento Photog: Totally agree. I mean shit, look at cell phones. A 160 x 120 thumbnail from a pic taken on a real camera has more detail than a 1 MP shot taken on any of the various Motorola cell phones I've owned. A camera of this caliber shouldn't exceed 5 MP. My experience has been that anything higher than that on a camera in the $300 - $400 dollar range just gets you more JPG noise.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[frank]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 22nd 2006 2:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio introduces 7.2 megapixel Exilim EX-Z70]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do you still need the dicking station to charge it? Like with my old Exilim? Why can't they make one that charges via a USB cable like my mobile phone does. Or at least just a simple mains lead. I hate having to carry the docking station AND power brick around.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred Finisterre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 22nd 2006 2:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio introduces 7.2 megapixel Exilim EX-Z70]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks nice. I wonder of the silver looks better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wisin y Yandel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 22nd 2006 2:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio introduces 7.2 megapixel Exilim EX-Z70]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</guid><description><![CDATA[heh....  dicking station.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Timmy!!!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 22nd 2006 3:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio introduces 7.2 megapixel Exilim EX-Z70]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</guid><description><![CDATA[Speaking of dicking station, that pic looks like the multi-talented Taylor Hayes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 22nd 2006 3:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio introduces 7.2 megapixel Exilim EX-Z70]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</guid><description><![CDATA[So you have all this pixel real estate, no stabilization, and no viewfinder. In low light...BLURRR!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Don O'Shea]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 22nd 2006 11:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio introduces 7.2 megapixel Exilim EX-Z70]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/22/casio-introduces-7-2-megapixel-exilim-ex-z70/</guid><description><![CDATA[Gee, Don, you should really read at least the summary before saying that it doesn't have image stabilization!<br><br>Personally, I go for Canon cameras, they kick ass.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Baker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2006 5:58AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
