<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Trinity low-cost Linux-based portable digital audio workstation</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/07/trinity-low-cost-linux-based-portable-digital-audio-workstation/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Trinity low-cost Linux-based portable digital audio workstation</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trinity low-cost Linux-based portable digital audio workstation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/07/trinity-low-cost-linux-based-portable-digital-audio-workstation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/07/trinity-low-cost-linux-based-portable-digital-audio-workstation/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder if Korg is going to have a problem with the name...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jakov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2006 8:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trinity low-cost Linux-based portable digital audio workstation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/07/trinity-low-cost-linux-based-portable-digital-audio-workstation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/07/trinity-low-cost-linux-based-portable-digital-audio-workstation/</guid><description><![CDATA[$1000.. eh i'll take my thinkpad T60 for 1200...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2006 9:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trinity low-cost Linux-based portable digital audio workstation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/07/trinity-low-cost-linux-based-portable-digital-audio-workstation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/07/trinity-low-cost-linux-based-portable-digital-audio-workstation/</guid><description><![CDATA[for the price why wouldn't one buy a maudio microtracker, marantz 671 or edirol r09? all have proven preamp fidelity and have been field tested pretty extensively.  if you need true 24/96 the edirol r4 is a steal and the tascam hd-p1 isn't far off.<br><br>yeah, the ability to run linux is nice but i don't see this being a huge hit for field recording or music production anytime soon.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2006 9:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trinity low-cost Linux-based portable digital audio workstation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/07/trinity-low-cost-linux-based-portable-digital-audio-workstation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/07/trinity-low-cost-linux-based-portable-digital-audio-workstation/</guid><description><![CDATA[Interesting idea, but the implementation makes zero sense. Why not a cheaper device as a portable music sketchpad? Spending $1000 to run Audacity is just silly. PC, Mac, or Linux laptops could give you better capabilities and better software for the same price.<br><br>I am surprised we're not seeing music devices running embedded Linux (or Windows, even), but there are better options both on the computer side and the specialized music hardware side (which is cheaper thanks to dedicated hardware for sound processing).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Kirn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2006 11:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trinity low-cost Linux-based portable digital audio workstation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/07/trinity-low-cost-linux-based-portable-digital-audio-workstation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/07/trinity-low-cost-linux-based-portable-digital-audio-workstation/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good effort, but sadly this misses the prosumer market they seem to be going for IMO.  In fact, I think this misses most markets, which isn't to say it's not useful, but I think like others are saying more dedicated hardware would be a better deal, esp. in the long run.  I guess if you are starting with NOTHING though, this solution would do.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Rayo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 8th 2006 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trinity low-cost Linux-based portable digital audio workstation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/07/trinity-low-cost-linux-based-portable-digital-audio-workstation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/07/trinity-low-cost-linux-based-portable-digital-audio-workstation/</guid><description><![CDATA[Low cost and $1000 are not compatible.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nate MC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 8th 2006 8:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Trinity low-cost Linux-based portable digital audio workstation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/07/trinity-low-cost-linux-based-portable-digital-audio-workstation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/07/trinity-low-cost-linux-based-portable-digital-audio-workstation/</guid><description><![CDATA[Four hour battery life and only 20gigs of storage. It doesn't sound like the primary audio tool it makes itself out to be. I will stick to my minidisc. Why? Remote editing, easily done with mindful interface, simple to pack.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John EP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 11th 2006 8:58AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>