http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/ Engadget Comments for Too many Mac rumors http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 1:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 1:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 1:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/
Fake.]]>Aug 3rd 2006 1:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 1:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/
How come no one is crying foul over WWDC coverage?

Anyway, keep it up Engadget. I'm sure we're in for a lot more speculation before the convention but I love it.]]>Aug 3rd 2006 1:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Fake]]>Aug 3rd 2006 1:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 1:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 1:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/
not to mention that lens blurring (or DOF blurring, or even motion blurring) looks NOTHING like the gaussian blurring this jokester used.

i could make a better fake with my eyes closed, not to mention that thing is fugly.

:P

i still love the silly rumors though!]]>Aug 3rd 2006 1:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 1:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/
MacFormat has a section every month called iCandy.

They post fake pics of apple hardware that doesn't exist.

C'mon guys.... do ur homework! :)]]>Aug 3rd 2006 1:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 1:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.flickr.com/photos/chouk/205655027/]]>Aug 3rd 2006 2:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 2:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 2:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/
Consider it debunked, I do not think Apple would name their device after a Free VOIP service that already exists:

http://www.icall.com/

]]>Aug 3rd 2006 2:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 2:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tensafefrogs/49199489/]]>Aug 3rd 2006 2:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Perhaps if whatever equipment you used put some excitement into their product line-up, you too would be excited to see what products were coming out of the pipeline. Apple is rewriting the books on how to make a customer, keep a customer, and reinvent the PC.]]>Aug 3rd 2006 2:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 2:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 2:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 2:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRiUbZF9yqY&NR]]>Aug 3rd 2006 2:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/
It's pathetic and I'm ashamed.]]>Aug 3rd 2006 2:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 2:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 2:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Anyway, I agree that this thing is ugly. And not only is it the wrong font, but it's formatted incorrectly (Apple uses simple sentences and phrases, but they never put a . after the product name, only the catchphrase). But debunking them is the fun part. :)
And tf, there HAVE been a lot of rumors. This just isn't a very good representation of the ones that are speculating over figures and specs.]]>Aug 3rd 2006 2:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/
http://therealtruth.info/article/21/apple-secrets-revealed-new-macpod]]>Aug 3rd 2006 3:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/
definitely is DEFINITELY spelled definitely and definitely doesn't contain the letter A

Learn to spell!]]>Aug 3rd 2006 3:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/
Tell me when you've ever seen that in an Apple ad? It just ruins the line of the image...

(I don't mean that they never use periods - they do, at the end of sentences. Not at the end of a 'bare' product name though. Too clunky)
]]>Aug 3rd 2006 3:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 3:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 4:03PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 4:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 4:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 4:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 5:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 5:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v520U3vS2iI&NR
]]>Aug 3rd 2006 6:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 6:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 3rd 2006 6:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/
Nick Fox

Link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYF3BpbFI9c]]>Aug 3rd 2006 7:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/
Microsoft keeps doing these big vision announcements and it's months to years before the product materializes. More often than not, when Apple does an announcement at a Macworld or a WWDC, it's along the lines of "here it is, it goes on sale today, hope you like it". Not every single time, but frequently.

"Roadmaps" vs "Unveilings". Big difference. Next week might provide some relevant examples.
]]>Aug 4th 2006 1:13AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/Aug 4th 2006 4:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/03/too-many-mac-rumors/
2. It was discussed a while ago that the new "powermac" will looks similar to the original, but with 2 drive slots.
]]>Aug 4th 2006 5:50AM