http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/ Engadget Comments for Brass dice shrunk to nearly invisible scale http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/Aug 17th 2006 1:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/
Looks like you failed.]]>Aug 17th 2006 2:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/Aug 17th 2006 2:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/Aug 17th 2006 2:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/Aug 17th 2006 2:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/Aug 17th 2006 2:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/
I swear, I rolled 3 6s in a row! didn't you see?

LOL]]>Aug 17th 2006 2:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/Aug 17th 2006 2:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/Aug 17th 2006 2:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/Aug 17th 2006 3:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/Aug 17th 2006 3:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/
So now, someone with a Scanning-Tunneling Electron Microscope is thinking about how many silicon atoms s/he'll have to move around to make it 100x smaller. ]]>Aug 17th 2006 3:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/Or would it then have to be a silicon die? :)]]>Aug 17th 2006 4:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/Aug 17th 2006 5:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/Aug 18th 2006 2:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/17/brass-dice-shrunk-to-nearly-invisible-scale/http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Dimension/8654/blade09.jpg]]>Aug 18th 2006 5:27AM