http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/ Engadget Comments for Company has tech to compensate for crappy cameras http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/Sep 2nd 2006 3:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/
Even if they could fix compression issues, these are still cheap sensors with even cheaper lenses.]]>Sep 2nd 2006 3:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/
I also love how odd it is that I saw that.]]>Sep 2nd 2006 5:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/Sep 2nd 2006 6:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/Sep 2nd 2006 8:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/
ZOOM! ENHANCE! ZOOM! ENHANCE!

Excellent, that single pixel is now a clear enough photo of a face to arrest the guy!]]>Sep 2nd 2006 9:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/
Anyway, that's pretty impressive. There is a very noticeable difference in the videos. Even if you don't see much more than you did before, it's still a lot clearer and smoother, which makes for a better viewing experience. Well done.]]>Sep 2nd 2006 11:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/
Hopefully these deblocking algorithms will soon make it into hardware decoders.]]>Sep 3rd 2006 12:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/Sep 3rd 2006 6:05AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/company-has-tech-to-compensate-for-crappy-cameras/Sep 3rd 2006 9:51AM