http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/ Engadget Comments for Nanomagnetic vortices could lead to bigger hard drives, faster RAM http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/
Bigger HDDs are a plus too.]]>Sep 8th 2006 7:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/Sep 8th 2006 6:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/
Renewable energy
Cyclical development
Less waste

.... oh, I'm not very smart. These things seem way out there. Anybody have an idea for my class project? ]]>Sep 8th 2006 4:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/you don't by any chance go to vrhs do you?]]>Sep 8th 2006 5:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/Sep 8th 2006 5:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/Maybe they've developed more technology than they're leading us to believe.....
:)
-Taylor]]>Sep 8th 2006 5:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/
http://www.cbox.cz/tomas_psika/tornada.htm

]]>Sep 8th 2006 5:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/Sep 9th 2006 6:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/Finally we harness the power of magnets... The same item we were told to keep our floppy disks and monitors away from.]]>Sep 9th 2006 1:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/Sep 9th 2006 7:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/
not you, too.

I ABSOLUTELY HATE THAT STUPID PICTURE!

my brother loves it, so it's always our background, and it is so annoying now....

oh well....]]>Sep 8th 2006 5:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/
http://www.computermuseum.li/Testpage/DiskPlatter-1301.htm]]>Sep 8th 2006 7:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/
sorry if I'm sour today. I lost something very important to me. ]]>Sep 8th 2006 8:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/micrometer > nanometer
therefore, not "nanomagnetic"

what will we call actual nanotechnology when it finally comes to market, picotechnology?]]>Sep 9th 2006 2:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/Sep 9th 2006 8:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/08/nanomagnetic-vortices-could-lead-to-bigger-hard-drives-faster-r/Sep 10th 2006 12:33PM