<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Sharp's UX-MF series: faxing has never been so good</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Sharp's UX-MF series: faxing has never been so good</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's UX-MF series: faxing has never been so good]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's all we need, spammers with yet another way to send crap to our inbox, now it's 20mb tiff files advertising car loans!!<br><br>bah™]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Emma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2006 9:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's UX-MF series: faxing has never been so good]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why oh why would an electronic gadget targeted at a digital environment use the 2.4GHz range for the cordless handset?<br><br>The announcement SHOULD read:<br>"We have this great fax machine but you have to shut down your 802.11b/g network to use it because we wanted it to include everything-but-the-kitchen-sink. That includes a cordless handset to augment that 5.8GHz, 8 handset, expandable unit you already own but DOESN'T interfere with your wireless network. Before you go all smart-consumer on us, keep in mind that we just wanted to make a fax machine that looks good on paper. The network stuff is your problem."<br><br>Dumb.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WeakGeek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2006 10:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's UX-MF series: faxing has never been so good]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Xerox M20i has had fax to email (in PDF) for 3 years.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2006 11:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's UX-MF series: faxing has never been so good]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</guid><description><![CDATA[Savin and Canon MFPs have had this ability for some time as well.<br><br>I suppose this might be an affordable option for the home office or small business who can't buy a big machine, but how many of those folks rely on fax technology?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2006 11:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's UX-MF series: faxing has never been so good]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</guid><description><![CDATA[fax? wot is this fax technology?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tekdroid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2006 12:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's UX-MF series: faxing has never been so good]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hate to break this to everyone, but faxing is still widely used when you needs a real signature or alternate means of getting physical copies of a document.  Your options are snail mail or fax.  The company I work for if you fax in a resume it gets scanned, OCR and put into a database with key words.  Know one physically gets a curled up piece of paper.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[theflew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2006 12:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's UX-MF series: faxing has never been so good]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</guid><description><![CDATA[a real signature?<br><br>I don't know what your experience is but anytime I need to sign something, faxing it is only a "this will do until you can get the original here."<br><br>Email didn't replace faxing, Fed Ex replaced faxing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brother9]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2006 1:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's UX-MF series: faxing has never been so good]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</guid><description><![CDATA[This won't replace faxing.  What we need is Fax to Fax via IP.  I'm sick of the low quality of regular faxes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SamMalone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2006 2:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's UX-MF series: faxing has never been so good]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ SamMalone<br><br>BRILLIANT! *cheers*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[whatsaname]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2006 4:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sharp's UX-MF series: faxing has never been so good]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/22/sharps-ux-mf-series-faxing-has-never-been-this-good/</guid><description><![CDATA[how is faxing needed for a real signature? <br><br>What is a fax? A 'connected' scanner/printer.<br><br>You print something out, sign it. Scan it to pdf or jpeg or what-have-you, and you email it. Why is fax needed again? Oh, that's right. For 'legacy' applications :p and businesses who still haven't got a clue (or the internet).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tekdroid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 22nd 2006 7:43PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
