<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Samsung Q1-SSD reviewed</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/25/samsung-q1-ssd-reviewed/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Samsung Q1-SSD reviewed</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung Q1-SSD reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/25/samsung-q1-ssd-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/25/samsung-q1-ssd-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's getting there. Soon Origami PCs will be all they were promised to be]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2006 8:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung Q1-SSD reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/25/samsung-q1-ssd-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/25/samsung-q1-ssd-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[May as well get an ultra portable. Better batterylife, more powerfull and they have keyboards.<br><br>Again these have no market at their current price]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[abigsmurf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2006 10:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung Q1-SSD reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/25/samsung-q1-ssd-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/25/samsung-q1-ssd-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Soon? Maybe in one or two years ...<br><br>Though, I'm hoping display and battery tech has eveolved enough till then to create some totaly new kind of PDA.<br><br>It's great to live in the time of rapid change, but then again it makes it hard to decide to go with the current state of affairs or wait for the next step.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2006 11:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung Q1-SSD reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/25/samsung-q1-ssd-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/25/samsung-q1-ssd-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wasn't one of the main selling points supposed to be the price? Twice to price and still not all the features that we were promised doesn't make it seem worth it at all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2006 7:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung Q1-SSD reviewed]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/25/samsung-q1-ssd-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/25/samsung-q1-ssd-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow at that price i'd rather get an OQO]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sfeng1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2006 9:43PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
